Using Lean Thinking at an otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinic to improve quality of care. (3rd November 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: van Leijen‐Zeelenberg, Janneke E.; Brunings, Jan Wouter; Houkes, Inge; van Raak, Arno J. A.; Ruwaard, Dirk; Vrijhoef, Hubertus J. M.; Kremer, Bernd
• Is Part Of: Laryngoscope. Volume 126:Number 4(2016:Apr.)
• Page Start: 839
• Page End: 846
• Publication Date: 2015-11-03
• Subjects: Quality improvement -- otolaryngology -- outpatient clinic -- Lean Thinking -- mixed methods; Otolaryngology -- Periodicals; 617.51005
• DOI: 10.1002/lary.25741
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0023-852X

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives/Hypothesis: Although Lean Thinking has led to considerable improvement in a variety of healthcare settings, its effects on otorhinolaryngology remain underexposed. This study reports on how the implementation of Lean Thinking at an otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinic has affected patient and provider satisfaction, waste reduction, and organizational culture. Study Design: Prospective before‐and‐after design. Methods: The 18‐month prospective before‐and‐after design used mixed methods for data collection and analysis. A survey was conducted to measure satisfaction among patients and providers. Semistructured interviews were conducted to evaluate the effect of Lean Thinking on waste and organizational culture. Results: During the project, 69 issues were posted on the Lean board. Improvements were made on 36 inefficiency issues, not all concerning a specific type of waste. Employees reported considerable improvement in transportation, motion, and waiting. Patient satisfaction was high both at baseline and follow‐up and did not change significantly. The effects on provider satisfaction were slight; satisfaction with autonomy and participation decreased significantly, but satisfaction with communication increased significantly. Conclusions: The implementation of Lean Thinking at an otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinic reduced waste and increased provider satisfaction with communication. Although patient satisfaction did not change significantly, it cannot be concluded that the intervention had no effect on perceived quality of care. Other approaches to measure patients' perceptions should be considered. Level of Evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 126:839–846, 2016