Priming for novel object associations: Neural differences from object item priming and equivalent forms of recognition. Issue 4 (30th October 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gomes, Carlos Alexandre; Figueiredo, Patrícia; Mayes, Andrew
• Is Part Of: Hippocampus. Volume 26:Issue 4(2016)
• Page Start: 472
• Page End: 491
• Publication Date: 2015-10-30
• Subjects: repetition priming -- novel associations -- recognition memory -- hippocampus -- perirhinal cortex; Hippocampus (Brain) -- Periodicals; 612.825
• DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22537
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1050-9631

Abstract

Abstract: The neural substrates of associative and item priming and recognition were investigated in a functional magnetic resonance imaging study over two separate sessions. In the priming session, participants decided which object of a pair was bigger during both study and test phases. In the recognition session, participants saw different object pairs and performed the same size‐judgement task followed by an associative recognition memory task. Associative priming was accompanied by reduced activity in the right middle occipital gyrus as well as in bilateral hippocampus. Object item priming was accompanied by reduced activity in extensive priming‐related areas in the bilateral occipitotemporofrontal cortex, as well as in the perirhinal cortex, but not in the hippocampus. Associative recognition was characterized by activity increases in regions linked to recollection, such as the hippocampus, posterior cingulate cortex, anterior medial frontal gyrus and posterior parahippocampal cortex. Item object priming and recognition recruited broadly overlapping regions (e.g., bilateral middle occipital and prefrontal cortices, left fusiform gyrus), even though the BOLD response was in opposite directions. These regions along with the precuneus, where both item priming and recognition were accompanied by activation, have been found to respond to object familiarity. The minimal structural overlap between object associative priming and recollection‐based associative recognition suggests that they depend on largely different stimulus‐related information and that the different directions of the effects indicate distinct retrieval mechanisms. In contrast, item priming and familiarity‐based recognition seemed mainly based on common memory information, although the extent of common processing between priming and familiarity remains unclear. Further implications of these findings are discussed. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.