Estimating daily forest carbon fluxes using a combination of ground and remotely sensed data. Issue 2 (2nd February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chirici, Gherardo; Chiesi, Marta; Corona, Piermaria; Salvati, Riccardo; Papale, Dario; Fibbi, Luca; Sirca, Costantino; Spano, Donatella; Duce, Pierpaolo; Marras, Serena; Matteucci, Giorgio; Cescatti, Alessandro; Maselli, Fabio
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 121:Issue 2(2016:Feb.)
• Page Start: 266
• Page End: 279
• Publication Date: 2016-02-02
• Subjects: forest ecosystem -- GPP -- NEP -- Spot‐VEGETATION -- modified C‐Fix -- BIOME‐BGC; Geobiology -- Periodicals; Biogeochemistry -- Periodicals; Biotic communities -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 577.14
• DOI: 10.1002/2015JG003019
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-8953

Abstract

Abstract: Several studies have demonstrated that Monteith's approach can efficiently predict forest gross primary production (GPP), while the modeling of net ecosystem production (NEP) is more critical, requiring the additional simulation of forest respirations. The NEP of different forest ecosystems in Italy was currently simulated by the use of a remote sensing driven parametric model (modified C‐Fix) and a biogeochemical model (BIOME‐BGC). The outputs of the two models, which simulate forests in quasi‐equilibrium conditions, are combined to estimate the carbon fluxes of actual conditions using information regarding the existing woody biomass. The estimates derived from the methodology have been tested against daily reference GPP and NEP data collected through the eddy correlation technique at five study sites in Italy. The first test concerned the theoretical validity of the simulation approach at both annual and daily time scales and was performed using optimal model drivers (i.e., collected or calibrated over the site measurements). Next, the test was repeated to assess the operational applicability of the methodology, which was driven by spatially extended data sets (i.e., data derived from existing wall‐to‐wall digital maps). A good estimation accuracy was generally obtained for GPP and NEP when using optimal model drivers. The use of spatially extended data sets worsens the accuracy to a varying degree, which is properly characterized. The model drivers with the most influence on the flux modeling strategy are, in increasing order of importance, forest type, soil features, meteorology, and forest woody biomass (growing stock volume). Key Points: GPP and NEP simulations of Mediterranean forest ecosystems are tested Modified C‐Fix and BIOME‐BGC are applied on annual and daily bases The results obtained confirm the validity of the modeling approach