Preliminary evaluation of a highly automated instrument for the selection of CD34+ cells from mobilized peripheral blood stem cell concentrates. Issue 2 (27th October 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Preliminary evaluation of a highly automated instrument for the selection of CD34+ cells from mobilized peripheral blood stem cell concentrates. Issue 2 (27th October 2015)
- Main Title:
- Preliminary evaluation of a highly automated instrument for the selection of CD34+ cells from mobilized peripheral blood stem cell concentrates
- Authors:
- Stroncek, David F.
Tran, Minh
Frodigh, Sue Ellen
David‐Ocampo, Virginia
Ren, Jiaqiang
Larochelle, Andre
Sheikh, Virginia
Sereti, Irini
Miller, Jeffery L.
Longin, Kevin
Sabatino, Marianna - Abstract:
- Abstract : BACKGROUND: Cell selection is an important part of manufacturing cellular therapies. A new highly automated instrument, the CliniMACS Prodigy (Miltenyi Biotec), was evaluated for the selection of CD34+ cells from mobilized peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) concentrates using monoclonal antibodies conjugated to paramagnetic particles. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PBSCs were collected by apheresis from 36 healthy subjects given granulocyte–colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) or G‐CSF plus plerixafor. CD34+ cells from 11 PBSC concentrates were isolated with the automated CliniMACS Prodigy and 25 with the semiautomated CliniMACS Plus Instrument. RESULTS: The proportion of CD34+ cells in the selected products obtained with the two instruments was similar: 93.6 ± 2.6% for the automated and 95.7 ± 3.3% for the semiautomated instrument (p > 0.05). The recovery of CD34+ cells from PBSC concentrates was less for the automated than the semiautomated instrument (51.4 ± 8.2% vs. 65.1 ± 15.7%; p = 0.019). The selected products from both instruments contained few and similar quantities of platelets (PLTs) and red blood cells. The depletion of CD3+ cells was less with the automated instrument (4.34 ± 0.2 log depletion vs. 5.20 ± 0.35 log depletion; p < 1 × 10 −6 ). Removal of PLTs from PBSC concentrates by washing was associated with better CD34+ cell recovery. We explored the reasons for lower CD34+ cell recovery by the Prodigy and found that the nonselected cells for the ProdigyAbstract : BACKGROUND: Cell selection is an important part of manufacturing cellular therapies. A new highly automated instrument, the CliniMACS Prodigy (Miltenyi Biotec), was evaluated for the selection of CD34+ cells from mobilized peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) concentrates using monoclonal antibodies conjugated to paramagnetic particles. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PBSCs were collected by apheresis from 36 healthy subjects given granulocyte–colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) or G‐CSF plus plerixafor. CD34+ cells from 11 PBSC concentrates were isolated with the automated CliniMACS Prodigy and 25 with the semiautomated CliniMACS Plus Instrument. RESULTS: The proportion of CD34+ cells in the selected products obtained with the two instruments was similar: 93.6 ± 2.6% for the automated and 95.7 ± 3.3% for the semiautomated instrument (p > 0.05). The recovery of CD34+ cells from PBSC concentrates was less for the automated than the semiautomated instrument (51.4 ± 8.2% vs. 65.1 ± 15.7%; p = 0.019). The selected products from both instruments contained few and similar quantities of platelets (PLTs) and red blood cells. The depletion of CD3+ cells was less with the automated instrument (4.34 ± 0.2 log depletion vs. 5.20 ± 0.35 log depletion; p < 1 × 10 −6 ). Removal of PLTs from PBSC concentrates by washing was associated with better CD34+ cell recovery. We explored the reasons for lower CD34+ cell recovery by the Prodigy and found that the nonselected cells for the Prodigy contained more PLTs than those for the CliniMACS Plus. CONCLUSIONS: CD34+ cells can be effectively selected from mobilized PBSC concentrates with the CliniMAC Prodigy, but the recovery of CD34+ cells and depletion of CD3+ cells was lower than with the semiautomated CliniMACS Plus Instrument. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Transfusion. Volume 56:Issue 2(2016:Feb.)
- Journal:
- Transfusion
- Issue:
- Volume 56:Issue 2(2016:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 56, Issue 2 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 56
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0056-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 511
- Page End:
- 517
- Publication Date:
- 2015-10-27
- Subjects:
- Hematology -- Periodicals
Blood -- Transfusion -- Periodicals
Blood Group Antigens -- Periodicals
Blood Preservation -- Periodicals
Blood Transfusion -- Periodicals
615 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1537-2995 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=trf ↗
http://www.transfusion.org ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/trf.13394 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0041-1132
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9020.704000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2576.xml