Increasing the size of portion options affects intake but not portion selection at a meal. (1st March 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zuraikat, Faris M.; Roe, Liane S.; Privitera, Gregory J.; Rolls, Barbara J.
• Is Part Of: Appetite. Volume 98(2016)
• Page Start: 95
• Page End: 100
• Publication Date: 2016-03-01
• Subjects: Portion size -- Portion selection -- Energy intake -- Eating environment; Food habits -- Periodicals; Appetite -- Periodicals; Appetite disorders -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 306.4613
• DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.12.023
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-6663

Abstract

Abstract: In an environment with large portion sizes, allowing consumers more control over their portion selection could moderate the effects on energy intake. We tested whether having subjects choose a portion from several options influenced the amount selected or consumed when all portion sizes were systematically increased. In a crossover design, 24 women and 26 men ate lunch in the lab once a week for 3 weeks. At each meal, subjects chose a portion of macaroni and cheese from a set of 3 portion options and consumed it ad libitum . Across 3 conditions, portion sizes in the set were increased; the order of the conditions was counterbalanced across subjects. For women the portion sets by weight (g) were 300/375/450, 375/450/525, and 450/525/600; for men the portions were 33% larger. The results showed that increasing the size of available portions did not significantly affect the relative size selected; across all portion sets, subjects chose the smallest available portion at 59% of meals, the medium at 27%, and the largest at 15%. The size of portions offered did, however, influence meal intake ( P < 0.0001). Mean intake (±SEM) was 16% greater when the largest set was offered (661 ± 34 kcal) than when the medium and smallest sets were offered (both 568 ± 18 kcal). These results suggest that portions are selected in relation to the other available options, and confirm the robust effect of portion size on intake. Although presenting a choice of portions can allow selection of smaller amounts, the sizes offered are a critical determinant of energy intake. Thus, the availability of choices could help to moderate intake if the portions offered are within an appropriate range for energy needs. Highlights: Subjects chose and ate a portion of pasta from 3 sets, each with 3 portion options. Offering larger portions in the set did not affect the relative size selected. Despite the options, intake was 16% higher from the set with the largest portions. The sizes of the portions offered are a critical determinant of energy intake.