Evaluation of Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma: Quasar Regression Program and Event Analysis. (3rd March 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Díaz-Alemán, Valentín T.; González-Hernández, Marta; Perera-Sanz, Daniel; Armas-Domínguez, Karintia
• Is Part Of: Current eye research. Volume 41:Number 3(2016:Mar.)
• Page Start: 383
• Page End: 390
• Publication Date: 2016-03-03
• Subjects: Event -- glaucoma -- progression -- regression -- visual field; Ophthalmology -- Periodicals; Eye -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Ophthalmology -- Periodicals; 573.88
• DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1020169
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0271-3683

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose : To determine the sensitivity, specificity and agreement between the Quasar program, glaucoma progression analysis (GPA II) event analysis and expert opinion in the detection of glaucomatous progression. Materials and methods : The Quasar program is based on linear regression analysis of both mean defect (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD). Each series of visual fields was evaluated by three methods; Quasar, GPA II and four experts. The sensitivity, specificity and agreement (kappa) for each method was calculated, using expert opinion as the reference standard. Results : The study included 439 SITA Standard visual fields of 56 eyes of 42 patients, with a mean of 7.8 ± 0.8 visual fields per eye. When suspected cases of progression were considered stable, sensitivity and specificity of Quasar, GPA II and the experts were 86.6% and 70.7%, 26.6% and 95.1%, and 86.6% and 92.6% respectively. When suspected cases of progression were considered as progressing, sensitivity and specificity of Quasar, GPA II and the experts were 79.1% and 81.2%, 45.8% and 90.6%, and 85.4% and 90.6% respectively. The agreement between Quasar and GPA II when suspected cases were considered stable or progressing was 0.03 and 0.28 respectively. The degree of agreement between Quasar and the experts when suspected cases were considered stable or progressing was 0.472 and 0.507. The degree of agreement between GPA II and the experts when suspected cases were considered stable or progressing was 0.262 and 0.342. Conclusions : The combination of MD and PSD regression analysis in the Quasar program showed better agreement with the experts and higher sensitivity than GPA II.