Direct and indirect trophic effects of predator depletion on basal trophic levels. Issue 2 (7th March 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chen, Huili; Hagerty, Steven; Crotty, Sinead M.; Bertness, Mark D.
• Is Part Of: Ecology. Volume 97:Issue 2(2016)
• Page Start: 338
• Page End: 346
• Publication Date: 2016-03-07
• Subjects: direct trophic effects -- human impacts -- indirect trophic effects -- fiddler crabs meiofauna -- predator depletion; Ecology -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Écologie -- Périodiques; Ecologie; Écologie; Écologie animale; Écologie végétale; Ecology; Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1890/15-0900.1
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0012-9658

Abstract

Abstract: Human population growth and development have heavily degraded coastal ecosystems with cascading impacts across multiple trophic levels. Understanding both the direct and indirect trophic effects of human activities is important for coastal conservation. In New England, recreational overfishing has triggered a regional trophic cascade. Predator depletion releases the herbivorous purple marsh crab from consumer control and leads to overgrazing of marsh cordgrass and salt marsh die‐off. The direct and indirect trophic effects of predator depletion on basal trophic levels, however, are not understood. Using observational and experimental data, we examined the hypotheses that (1) direct trophic effects of predator depletion decrease meiofaunal abundance by releasing deposit feeding fiddler crabs from consumer control, and/or (2) indirect trophic effects of predator depletion increase meiofaunal abundance by releasing blue carbon via the erosion of centuries of accreted marsh peat. Experimental deposit feeder removal led to 23% higher meiofaunal density at die‐off than at healthy sites, while reciprocally transplanting sediment from die‐off and healthy sites revealed that carbon‐rich die‐off sediment increased meiofauna density by over 164%: six times stronger than direct trophic effects. Recovering sites had both carbon‐rich sediment and reduced deposit feeding leading to higher meiofauna densities than both die‐off and healthy sites. This suggests that consequences of the trophic downgrading of coastal habitats can be driven by both direct and indirect trophic mechanisms that may vary in direction and magnitude, making their elucidation dependent on experimental manipulations.