Otolith size differences during early life of dwarf and cannibal Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus). Issue 2 (24th November 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Florø‐Larsen, Bjørn; Finstad, Anders G.; Berg, Ole K.; Olsen, Per H.
• Is Part Of: Ecology of freshwater fish. Volume 25:Issue 2(2016:Apr.)
• Page Start: 203
• Page End: 210
• Publication Date: 2014-11-24
• Subjects: Salvelinus alpinus -- polymorphism -- bimodal size distribution -- hatching ring -- back calculation -- polar; Freshwater fishes -- Periodicals; Freshwater fishes -- Ecology -- Periodicals; Fisheries -- Periodicals; 597.092
• DOI: 10.1111/eff.12202
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0906-6691

Abstract

Abstract: In Arctic and alpine lakes, Arctic char [ Salvelinus alpinus (L.)] often form two distinct morphs: invertebrate feeders ('dwarfs') and piscivores ('giant or cannibals'). Here, we test for early life history growth variation in dimorphic Arctic char as a proximate explanation for the observed life history variation between the two forms. Char were sampled in 11 alpine and Arctic Norwegian lakes. Dwarfs (defined as sexually mature char less than 15 cm long; N = 304) had a mean total length of 105 mm, whereas the typical cannibal (body length above 20 cm; N = 153) was 388 mm long. A positive correlation between egg size and otolith hatching ring were ascertained in a separate hatching experiment with brown trout ( Salmo trutta ) and it is assumed that this relationship also is valid for Arctic char, and otolith size was used as a proxy for length. Otolith hatching ring from Arctic char cannibals was larger (mean ± SD; 187 ± 24 μm) than those from dwarfs (mean ± SD; 164 ± 23 μm). There were only minor size differences between dwarfs and cannibals during the next three years, after which dwarfs usually matured. Two mutually nonexclusive, proximate explanations for the differentiation into separate morphs (dwarfs and cannibals) are therefore maternal effects and/or genetic based differentiation. The high catchability of large piscivorous char and low production in alpine and Arctic lake ecosystems may make these stocks particularly vulnerable to overexploitation.