CNS- and ANS-arousal predict response to antidepressant medication: Findings from the randomized iSPOT-D study. (February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Olbrich, Sebastian; Tränkner, Anja; Surova, Galina; Gevirtz, Richard; Gordon, Evian; Hegerl, Ulrich; Arns, Martijn
• Is Part Of: Journal of psychiatric research. Volume 73(2016:Feb.)
• Page Start: 108
• Page End: 115
• Publication Date: 2016-02
• Subjects: iSPOT-D -- CNS-arousal -- EEG-Vigilance -- Heart rate -- Antidepressant -- Major depressive disorder; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; Mental Disorders -- Periodicals; Maladies mentales -- Périodiques; Psychiatry; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616.89005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.12.001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-3956

Abstract

Abstract: Arousal systems are one of the recently announced NIMH Research Domain Criteria to inform future diagnostics and treatment prediction. In major depressive disorder (MDD), altered central nervous system (CNS) wakefulness regulation and an increased sympathetic autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity have been identified as biomarkers with possible discriminative value for prediction of antidepressant treatment response. Therefore, the hypothesis of a more pronounced decline of CNS and ANS-arousal being predictive for a positive treatment outcome to selective-serotonin-reuptake-inhibitor (SSRI) treatment was derived from a small, independent exploratory dataset (N = 25) and replicated using data from the randomized international Study to Predict Optimized Treatment Response in Depression (iSPOT-D). There, 1008 MDD participants were randomized to either a SSRI (escitalopram or sertraline) or a serotonin-norepinephrine-reuptake-inhibitor (SNRI-venlafaxine) arm. Treatment response was established after eight weeks using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. CNS-arousal (i.e. electroencephalogram-vigilance), ANS-arousal (heart rate) and their change across time were assessed during rest. Responders and remitters to SSRI treatment were characterized by a faster decline of CNS-arousal during rest whereas SNRI responders showed a significant increase of ANS-arousal. Furthermore, SSRI responders/remitters showed an association between ANS- and CNS-arousal regulation in comparison to non-responders/non-remitters while this was not the case for SNRI treatment arm. Since positive treatment outcome to SSRI and SNRI was linked to distinct CNS and ANS-arousal profiles, these predictive markers probably are not disorder specific alterations but reflect the responsiveness of the nervous system to specific drugs. Graphical abstract: Responders to SSRI were characterized by a steeper decline of CNS-arousal (EEG-vigilance) than non-responders. No such pattern was found for the SNRI group. Highlights: Resting state CNS- and ANS-arousal predict treatment outcome to antidepressants. SSRI responders were characterized by a fast decline of CNS-arousal. SNRI responders were characterized by an increase of ANS-arousal.