Ultra-processed foods have the worst nutrient profile, yet they are the most available packaged products in a sample of New Zealand supermarkets. Issue 3 (29th July 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Ultra-processed foods have the worst nutrient profile, yet they are the most available packaged products in a sample of New Zealand supermarkets. Issue 3 (29th July 2015)
- Main Title:
- Ultra-processed foods have the worst nutrient profile, yet they are the most available packaged products in a sample of New Zealand supermarkets
- Authors:
- Luiten, Claire M
Steenhuis, Ingrid HM
Eyles, Helen
Ni Mhurchu, Cliona
Waterlander, Wilma E - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: To examine the availability of packaged food products in New Zealand supermarkets by level of industrial processing, nutrient profiling score (NPSC), price (energy, unit and serving costs) and brand variety. Design: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data on packaged supermarket food and non-alcoholic beverages. Products were classified according to level of industrial processing (minimally, culinary and ultra-processed) and their NPSC. Setting: Packaged foods available in four major supermarkets in Auckland, New Zealand. Subjects: Packaged supermarket food products for the years 2011 and 2013. Results: The majority (84 % in 2011 and 83 % in 2013) of packaged foods were classified as ultra-processed. A significant positive association was found between the level of industrial processing and NPSC, i.e. ultra-processed foods had a worse nutrient profile (NPSC=11·63) than culinary processed foods (NPSC=7·95), which in turn had a worse nutrient profile than minimally processed foods (NPSC=3·27), P <0·001. No clear associations were observed between the three price measures and level of processing. The study observed many variations of virtually the same product. The ten largest food manufacturers produced 35 % of all packaged foods available. Conclusions: In New Zealand supermarkets, ultra-processed foods comprise the largest proportion of packaged foods and are less healthy than less processed foods. The lack of significant price differenceAbstract: Objective: To examine the availability of packaged food products in New Zealand supermarkets by level of industrial processing, nutrient profiling score (NPSC), price (energy, unit and serving costs) and brand variety. Design: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data on packaged supermarket food and non-alcoholic beverages. Products were classified according to level of industrial processing (minimally, culinary and ultra-processed) and their NPSC. Setting: Packaged foods available in four major supermarkets in Auckland, New Zealand. Subjects: Packaged supermarket food products for the years 2011 and 2013. Results: The majority (84 % in 2011 and 83 % in 2013) of packaged foods were classified as ultra-processed. A significant positive association was found between the level of industrial processing and NPSC, i.e. ultra-processed foods had a worse nutrient profile (NPSC=11·63) than culinary processed foods (NPSC=7·95), which in turn had a worse nutrient profile than minimally processed foods (NPSC=3·27), P <0·001. No clear associations were observed between the three price measures and level of processing. The study observed many variations of virtually the same product. The ten largest food manufacturers produced 35 % of all packaged foods available. Conclusions: In New Zealand supermarkets, ultra-processed foods comprise the largest proportion of packaged foods and are less healthy than less processed foods. The lack of significant price difference between ultra- and less processed foods suggests ultra-processed foods might provide time-poor consumers with more value for money. These findings highlight the need to improve the supermarket food supply by reducing numbers of ultra-processed foods and by reformulating products to improve their nutritional profile. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Public health nutrition. Volume 19:Issue 3(2016)
- Journal:
- Public health nutrition
- Issue:
- Volume 19:Issue 3(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 19, Issue 3 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 19
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0019-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 530
- Page End:
- 538
- Publication Date:
- 2015-07-29
- Subjects:
- Processed food, -- Nutrient profiling, -- Price, -- Food brands, -- Supermarket interventions
Nutrition -- Periodicals
Nutrition policy -- Periodicals
Public health -- Periodicals
613.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PHN ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1017/S1368980015002177 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1368-9800
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library STI - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 1671.xml