Comparison of long-term oncological outcomes of appendiceal cancer and colon cancer: A multicenter retrospective study. (March 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of long-term oncological outcomes of appendiceal cancer and colon cancer: A multicenter retrospective study. (March 2016)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of long-term oncological outcomes of appendiceal cancer and colon cancer: A multicenter retrospective study
- Authors:
- Son, Il Tae
Ahn, Soyeon
Park, Kyu Joo
Oh, Jae Hwan
Jeong, Seung-Yong
Park, Hyoung-Chul
Heo, Seung Chul
Youk, Eui Gon
Park, Jin-Taek
Ihn, Myong Hoon
Oh, Heung-Kwon
Kim, Duck-Woo
Lee, Kyoung Ho
Kang, Sung-Bum - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: There has been no comparative study of the long-term oncological outcomes of appendiceal cancer and colon cancer. We hypothesized that the oncological outcome is worse in appendiceal cancer because perforation is more frequent than in colon cancer. Methods: Patients with stage I–III were selected from 5046 patients with appendiceal or colon cancer, between September 2001 and June 2010. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary endpoint. Multivariate analyses with Cox proportional hazards model for DFS and logistic regression model for perforation were conducted. A matching model was used to compensate for the heterogeneity between groups. Results: The perforation rate was 44.7% in appendiceal cancer (n = 47), but 1.1% in colon cancer (n = 2828) ( p = 0.001). The 5-year DFS rate was lower in appendiceal cancer than in colon cancer (57.9% vs . 85.2%, p = 0.001; matching model, 54.2% vs . 78.4%, p = 0.038), with a higher rate of peritoneal seeding (25.5% vs . 2.5%, p = 0.001; matching model, 24.0% vs . 4.0%, p = 0.007). Multivariate Cox regression showed that appendiceal cancer was an independent prognostic factor for poor DFS (hazard ratio = 2.602, 95% confidence interval = 1.26–5.35, p = 0.009), and logistic regression confirmed that appendiceal cancer was the risk factor associated with perforation (odds ratio = 66.265, 95% confidence interval = 28.21–155.61, p = 0.001). Conclusions: This study suggested that the long-termAbstract: Background: There has been no comparative study of the long-term oncological outcomes of appendiceal cancer and colon cancer. We hypothesized that the oncological outcome is worse in appendiceal cancer because perforation is more frequent than in colon cancer. Methods: Patients with stage I–III were selected from 5046 patients with appendiceal or colon cancer, between September 2001 and June 2010. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary endpoint. Multivariate analyses with Cox proportional hazards model for DFS and logistic regression model for perforation were conducted. A matching model was used to compensate for the heterogeneity between groups. Results: The perforation rate was 44.7% in appendiceal cancer (n = 47), but 1.1% in colon cancer (n = 2828) ( p = 0.001). The 5-year DFS rate was lower in appendiceal cancer than in colon cancer (57.9% vs . 85.2%, p = 0.001; matching model, 54.2% vs . 78.4%, p = 0.038), with a higher rate of peritoneal seeding (25.5% vs . 2.5%, p = 0.001; matching model, 24.0% vs . 4.0%, p = 0.007). Multivariate Cox regression showed that appendiceal cancer was an independent prognostic factor for poor DFS (hazard ratio = 2.602, 95% confidence interval = 1.26–5.35, p = 0.009), and logistic regression confirmed that appendiceal cancer was the risk factor associated with perforation (odds ratio = 66.265, 95% confidence interval = 28.21–155.61, p = 0.001). Conclusions: This study suggested that the long-term oncological outcomes are worse for appendiceal cancer than for colon cancer, attributed to higher perforation rate in appendiceal cancer. Highlights: A comparative study for the oncologic outcomes of heterogeneous two malignancies. Worse oncologic outcome of appendiceal cancer compared with colon cancer. Perforation was associated with poor prognosis of appendiceal cancer. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Surgical oncology. Volume 25:Number 1(2016)
- Journal:
- Surgical oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 25:Number 1(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 25, Issue 1 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 25
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0025-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 37
- Page End:
- 43
- Publication Date:
- 2016-03
- Subjects:
- Appendiceal cancer -- Colon cancer -- Disease-free survival
Cancer -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- surgery -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
616.994059 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09607404 ↗
http://www.so-online.net/ ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/09607404 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/09607404 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.suronc.2015.12.006 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0960-7404
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8548.242000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 1568.xml