Modelling complex systems of heterogeneous agents to better design sustainability transitions policy. (March 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Modelling complex systems of heterogeneous agents to better design sustainability transitions policy. (March 2016)
- Main Title:
- Modelling complex systems of heterogeneous agents to better design sustainability transitions policy
- Authors:
- Mercure, Jean-Francois
Pollitt, Hector
Bassi, Andrea. M.
Viñuales, Jorge. E
Edwards, Neil R. - Abstract:
- Highlights: Adding behavioural and complexity sciences in environmental policy assessment. New model enables to broaden the scope of environmental policy analysis. Applied to innovation diffusion, green growth, uncertainty, policy effectiveness. Examples: macroeconomic impacts, cascading uncertainty and cross-sectoral impacts. Abstract: This article proposes a fundamental methodological shift in the modelling of policy interventions for sustainability transitions in order to account for complexity (e.g. self-reinforcing mechanisms, such as technology lock-ins, arising from multi-agent interactions) and agent heterogeneity (e.g. differences in consumer and investment behaviour arising from income stratification). We first characterise the uncertainty faced by climate policy-makers and its implications for investment decision-makers. We then identify five shortcomings in the equilibrium and optimisation-based approaches most frequently used to inform sustainability policy: (i) their normative, optimisation-based nature, (ii) their unrealistic reliance on the full-rationality of agents, (iii) their inability to account for mutual influences among agents (multi-agent interactions) and capture related self-reinforcing (positive feedback) processes, (iv) their inability to represent multiple solutions and path-dependency, and (v) their inability to properly account for agent heterogeneity. The aim of this article is to introduce an alternative modelling approach based onHighlights: Adding behavioural and complexity sciences in environmental policy assessment. New model enables to broaden the scope of environmental policy analysis. Applied to innovation diffusion, green growth, uncertainty, policy effectiveness. Examples: macroeconomic impacts, cascading uncertainty and cross-sectoral impacts. Abstract: This article proposes a fundamental methodological shift in the modelling of policy interventions for sustainability transitions in order to account for complexity (e.g. self-reinforcing mechanisms, such as technology lock-ins, arising from multi-agent interactions) and agent heterogeneity (e.g. differences in consumer and investment behaviour arising from income stratification). We first characterise the uncertainty faced by climate policy-makers and its implications for investment decision-makers. We then identify five shortcomings in the equilibrium and optimisation-based approaches most frequently used to inform sustainability policy: (i) their normative, optimisation-based nature, (ii) their unrealistic reliance on the full-rationality of agents, (iii) their inability to account for mutual influences among agents (multi-agent interactions) and capture related self-reinforcing (positive feedback) processes, (iv) their inability to represent multiple solutions and path-dependency, and (v) their inability to properly account for agent heterogeneity. The aim of this article is to introduce an alternative modelling approach based on complexity dynamics and agent heterogeneity, and explore its use in four key areas of sustainability policy, namely (1) technology adoption and diffusion, (2) macroeconomic impacts of low-carbon policies, (3) interactions between the socio-economic system and the natural environment, and (4) the anticipation of policy outcomes. The practical relevance of the proposed methodology is subsequently discussed by reference to four specific applications relating to each of the above areas: the diffusion of transport technology, the impact of low-carbon investment on income and employment, the management of cascading uncertainties, and the cross-sectoral impact of biofuels policies. In conclusion, the article calls for a fundamental methodological shift aligning the modelling of the socio-economic system with that of the climatic system, for a combined and realistic understanding of the impact of sustainability policies. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Global environmental change. Volume 37(2016:Mar.)
- Journal:
- Global environmental change
- Issue:
- Volume 37(2016:Mar.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 37 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 37
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0037-0000-0000
- Page Start:
- 102
- Page End:
- 115
- Publication Date:
- 2016-03
- Subjects:
- Environmental policy assessment -- Climate change mitigation -- Complexity sciences -- Behavioural sciences
Environmental policy -- Periodicals
Human ecology -- Periodicals
Nature -- Effect of human beings on -- Periodicals
Environment -- Periodicals
Environnement -- Politique gouvernementale -- Périodiques
Écologie humaine -- Périodiques
Homme -- Influence sur la nature -- Périodiques
Environmental policy
Human ecology
Nature -- Effect of human beings on
Periodicals
Electronic journals
333.7 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09593780 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.02.003 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0959-3780
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4195.397000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 618.xml