Contribution of writing to reading: Dissociation between cognitive and motor process in the left dorsal premotor cortex. Issue 4 (27th January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pattamadilok, Chotiga; Ponz, Aurélie; Planton, Samuel; Bonnard, Mireille
• Is Part Of: Human brain mapping. Volume 37:Issue 4(2016:Apr.)
• Page Start: 1531
• Page End: 1543
• Publication Date: 2016-01-27
• Subjects: transcranial magnetic stimulation -- Exner's area -- sublexical process -- cortico‐spinal excitability -- functional role; Brain mapping -- Periodicals; 611.81
• DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23118
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1065-9471

Abstract

Abstract: Functional brain imaging studies reported activation of the left dorsal premotor cortex (PMd), that is, a main area in the writing network, in reading tasks. However, it remains unclear whether this area is causally relevant for written stimulus recognition or its activation simply results from a passive coactivation of reading and writing networks. Here, we used chronometric paired‐pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to address this issue by disrupting the activity of the PMd, the so‐called Exner's area, while participants performed a lexical decision task. Both words and pseudowords were presented in printed and handwritten characters. The latter was assumed to be closely associated with motor representations of handwriting gestures. We found that TMS over the PMd in relatively early time‐windows, i.e., between 60 and 160 ms after the stimulus onset, increased reaction times to pseudoword without affecting word recognition. Interestingly, this result pattern was found for both printed and handwritten characters, that is, regardless of whether the characters evoked motor representations of writing actions. Our result showed that under some circumstances the activation of the PMd does not simply result from passive association between reading and writing networks but has a functional role in the reading process. At least, at an early stage of written stimuli recognition, this role seems to depend on a common sublexical and serial process underlying writing and pseudoword reading rather than on an implicit evocation of writing actions during reading as typically assumed. Hum Brain Mapp 37:1531‐1543, 2016 . © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.