Comparison of four different lasers for acne scars: Resurfacing and fractional lasers. Issue 4 (April 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of four different lasers for acne scars: Resurfacing and fractional lasers. Issue 4 (April 2016)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of four different lasers for acne scars: Resurfacing and fractional lasers
- Authors:
- You, Hi-Jin
Kim, Deok-Woo
Yoon, Eul-Sik
Park, Seung-Ha - Abstract:
- Summary: Background: Acne scars are common and cause cosmetic problems. There is a multitude of treatment options for acne scars, including dermabrasion, chemical peeling, and fillers, but the advent of laser technology has greatly improved the treatment of acne scars. Although several laser systems are available, studies comparing their efficacy are limited. This study compares the results of treatments using resurfacing (carbon dioxide, CO2 ; erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet, Er:YAG) versus fractional (nonablative fractional laser, NAFL; ablative fractional laser, AFL) lasers. Methods: A retrospective photographic analysis of 58 patients who underwent laser treatment for facial atrophic acne scars was performed. Clinical improvement was assessed by six blinded investigators with a scale graded from 0 to 10. Adverse events were also noted. Results: Mean improvement scores of the CO2, Er:YAG, NAFL, and AFL groups were 6.0, 5.8, 2.2, and 5.2, respectively. The NAFL group showed a significantly lower score than the other groups. The mean number of treatments was significantly greater in the fractional laser groups than in the resurfacing laser groups. The resurfacing laser groups had a prolonged recovery period and high risk of complications. The Er:YAG laser caused less erythema or pigmentation compared to the CO2 laser. Conclusions: Although the CO2 laser, Er:YAG laser, and AFL improved the acne scars, the CO2 laser had a greater downtime. Three consecutive AFLSummary: Background: Acne scars are common and cause cosmetic problems. There is a multitude of treatment options for acne scars, including dermabrasion, chemical peeling, and fillers, but the advent of laser technology has greatly improved the treatment of acne scars. Although several laser systems are available, studies comparing their efficacy are limited. This study compares the results of treatments using resurfacing (carbon dioxide, CO2 ; erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet, Er:YAG) versus fractional (nonablative fractional laser, NAFL; ablative fractional laser, AFL) lasers. Methods: A retrospective photographic analysis of 58 patients who underwent laser treatment for facial atrophic acne scars was performed. Clinical improvement was assessed by six blinded investigators with a scale graded from 0 to 10. Adverse events were also noted. Results: Mean improvement scores of the CO2, Er:YAG, NAFL, and AFL groups were 6.0, 5.8, 2.2, and 5.2, respectively. The NAFL group showed a significantly lower score than the other groups. The mean number of treatments was significantly greater in the fractional laser groups than in the resurfacing laser groups. The resurfacing laser groups had a prolonged recovery period and high risk of complications. The Er:YAG laser caused less erythema or pigmentation compared to the CO2 laser. Conclusions: Although the CO2 laser, Er:YAG laser, and AFL improved the acne scars, the CO2 laser had a greater downtime. Three consecutive AFL treatments are as effective as a single treatment with resurfacing lasers, with shorter social downtime periods and less adverse effects. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery. Volume 69:Issue 4(2016:Apr.)
- Journal:
- Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 69:Issue 4(2016:Apr.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 69, Issue 4 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 69
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0069-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- e87
- Page End:
- e95
- Publication Date:
- 2016-04
- Subjects:
- Acne scar -- Laser resurfacing -- Ablative fractional laser -- Nonablative fractional laser
Surgery, Plastic -- Great Britain -- Periodicals
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals
Surgery, Plastic -- Great Britain -- Periodicals
617.9505 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/17486815 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.12.012 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1748-6815
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5040.695800
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2210.xml