Qualitative research practices and family business scholarship: A review and future research agenda. Issue 1 (March 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fletcher, Denise; Massis, Alfredo De; Nordqvist, Mattias
• Is Part Of: Journal of family business strategy. Volume 7:Issue 1(2016:Mar.)
• Page Start: 8
• Page End: 25
• Publication Date: 2016-03
• Subjects: Qualitative research -- Qualitative methods -- Epistemology -- Interpretivism -- Family business -- Future research; Family-owned business enterprises -- Management -- Periodicals; Strategic planning -- Periodicals; planning -- Periodicals; 658.04505
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.08.001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1877-8585

Abstract

Highlights: Recommendations for addressing the foundational questions of qualitative family business research. Review of existing qualitative family business inquiry. Qualitative methods for generating new understandings of family businesses. Encouragement to overcome existing limits in the use of qualitative methods. Abstract: In spite of various calls for a wider application of qualitative research in the family business field, it is our contention that the full potential of qualitative inquiry is not being fully realized. Part of the reason for this relates to the tendency to promote methods choice and diversity rather than addressing the foundational questions and processes which underlie qualitative research choices. These tendencies obscure attention to the reasons why researchers choose qualitative methods and the kinds of foundational issues about family businesses that are brought to light through qualitative research. To address this, we undertake an analysis of the most-cited articles using qualitative methods from an annotated bibliography of family business studies. From this, we identify the strengths and weaknesses of extant qualitative studies in family business research and argue for the need to re-orientate calls in family business research towards the foundational questions (rather than methods) that underline qualitative inquiry.