Out of sight, out of mind? Does terminating the physical presence of a geriatric consultant in the community clinic reduce the implementation rate for geriatric recommendations. (May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Freud, Tamar; Punchik, Boris; Biderman, Aya; Peleg, Roni; Kagan, Ella; Barzak, Alex; Press, Yan
• Is Part Of: Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. Volume 64(2016)
• Page Start: 115
• Page End: 122
• Publication Date: 2016-05
• Subjects: Geriatric assessment -- Implementation of recommendations -- Community dwelling; Aging -- Periodicals; Geriatrics -- Periodicals; Gerontology -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 305.26
• DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.01.010
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0167-4943

Abstract

Highlights: Elimination of the position of geriatric consultant in the primary care clinic led to a reduction in the implementation of geriatric recommendations. This reduction in implementation rates is most likely explained by the absence of direct contact between the family physician and the geriatrician. This outcome is important for the planning of geriatric services. Abstract: Aim: To assess the effect of moving the geriatric consultation from the primary care clinic to another setting, on the rate of implementation of geriatric recommendations by family physicians. Methods: A retrospective review of the computerized medical records of elderly patients in four primary care clinics. The rate of implementation of geriatric recommendations was compared between clinics in which a geriatric consultant was physically present (control clinics) and a clinic where the consultation took place elsewhere (study clinic). In addition, the results of the present study were compared to a previous study in which the geriatric consultation was carried out in the study clinic and the family doctor was an active participant. Results: 127 computerized files were reviewed in the study clinic and 133 in the control clinics. The mean age of the patients was 81.1 ± 6.3 years and 63.1% were women. The overall implementation of geriatric recommendations by family doctors in the study clinic was 55.9%, a statistically significant decrease compared to the previous study where the rate was 73.9% ( p < 0.0001). In contrast, there was no change in the implementation rate in the control clinics at 65.0% in the present study and 59.9% in the previous one ( p = 0.205). Conclusions: Direct, person-to-person contact between the geriatric consultant and the family doctor has a beneficial effect on the implementation of geriatric recommendations. This should be considered by healthcare policy makers when planning geriatric services in the community.