Can the accuracy of multifocal intraocular lens power calculation be improved to make patients spectacle free?. Issue 2 (April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ramji, Hasnain; Moore, Johnny; Moore, CB Tara; Shah, Sunil
• Is Part Of: Contact lens & anterior eye. Volume 39:Issue 2(2016)
• Page Start: 160
• Page End: 166
• Publication Date: 2016-04
• Subjects: Multifocal -- Intraocular -- Ray -- Tracing -- Formula -- Optimisation; Anterior segment (Eye) -- Periodicals; Contact lenses -- Periodicals; Segment antérieur (Œil) -- Périodiques; Lentilles de contact -- Périodiques; 617.752305
• DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2015.10.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1367-0484

Abstract

Highlights: Increased patient visual outcome expectations following lens implant surgery. New segmental multifocal lens demonstrated improved visual outcome than previously. Comparison of 5 conventional formulae, 1 new ray tracing technique or combination. Results segregated into short/long axial length as per College of Ophthalmologists. Excellent but equivalent results comparing biometry calculation formulae for power. Abstract: Purpose: To optimise intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation techniques for a segmental multifocal IOL, LENTIS™ MPlus ® (Oculentis GmbH, Berlin, Germany) and assess outcomes. Methods: A retrospective consecutive non-randomised case series of patients receiving the MPlus ® IOL following cataract surgery or clear lens extraction was performed at a privately owned ophthalmic hospital, Midland Eye, Solihull, UK. Analysis was undertaken of 116 eyes, with uncomplicated lens replacement surgery using the LENTIS™ MPlus ® lenses. Pre-operative biometry data were stratified into short (<22.00 mm) and long axial lengths (ALs) (≥22.00 mm). IOL power predictions were calculated with SRK/T, Holladay I, Hoffer Q, Holladay II and Haigis formulae and compared to the final manifest refraction. These were compared with the OKULIX ray tracing method and the stratification technique suggested by the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCOphth). Results: Using SRK/T for long eyes and Hoffer Q for short eyes, 64% achieved postoperative subjective refractions of ≤±0.25 D, 83% ≤ ±0.50 D and 93% ≤ ±0.75 D, with a maximum predictive error of 1.25 D. No specific calculation method performed best across all ALs; however for ALs under 22 mm Hoffer Q and Holliday I methods performed best. Conclusions: Excellent but equivalent overall refractive results were found between all biometry methods used in this multifocal IOL study. For eyes with ALs under 22 mm Hoffer Q and Holliday I performed best. Current techniques mean that patients are still likely to need top up glasses for certain situations.