Artificial neural networks in the calibration of nonlinear mechanical models. (May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mareš, Tomáš; Janouchová, Eliška; Kučerová, Anna
• Is Part Of: Advances in engineering software. Volume 95(2016)
• Page Start: 68
• Page End: 81
• Publication Date: 2016-05
• Subjects: Artificial neural network -- Multi-layer perceptron -- Parameter identification -- Principal component analysis -- Sensitivity analysis -- Affinity hydration model -- Concrete; Computer-aided engineering -- Periodicals; Engineering -- Computer programs -- Periodicals; Engineering -- Software -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 620.0028553
• DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.017
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0965-9978

Abstract

Highlights: Paper reviews applications of artificial neural networks in model calibration. Neural network-based calibration strategies are classified into three groups. Identification strategies are compared on calibration of affinity hydration model. The most precise strategy uses an ANN-based surrogate of each response component. Principal component-based inverse mapping is the best for a repeated use on new data. Abstract: Rapid development in numerical modelling of materials and the complexity of new models increase quickly together with their computational demands. Despite the growing performance of modern computers and clusters, calibration of such models from noisy experimental data remains a nontrivial and often computationally intensive task. Layered neural networks provide a robust and efficient technique for overcoming the time-consuming simulations of calibrated models. The potential advantages of neural networks include simple implementation and high versatility in approximating nonlinear relationships. Therefore, there were several approaches proposed in literature for accelerating the calibration of nonlinear models by neural networks. This contribution reviews and compares three possible strategies based on approximating (i) the model response, (ii) the inverse relationship between the model response and its parameters and (iii) an error function quantifying how well the model fits the data. The advantages and drawbacks of particular strategies are demonstrated with the calibration of four parameters of an affinity hydration model from simulated data as well as from experimental measurements. The affinity hydration model is highly nonlinear but computationally cheap, thus allowing its calibration without any approximation and better quantification of results obtained by the examined calibration strategies. This paper can be viewed as a guide for engineers to help them develop an appropriate strategy for their particular calibration problems.