Immediate versus Delayed Treatment in the Anterior Maxilla Using Single Implants with a Laser‐Microtextured Collar: 3‐Year Results of a Case Series on Hard‐ and Soft‐Tissue Response and Esthetics. Issue 2 (11th May 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Guarnieri, Renzo; Belleggia, Fabrizio; Grande, Maurizio
• Is Part Of: Journal of prosthodontics. Volume 25:Issue 2(2016)
• Page Start: 135
• Page End: 145
• Publication Date: 2015-05-11
• Subjects: Immediate implant treatment -- delayed implant treatment -- esthetic zone -- laser‐microtextured surface; Prosthodontics -- Periodicals; Dental implants -- Periodicals; Dentistry -- Periodicals; 617.69
• DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12295
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1059-941X

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: To compare peri‐implant marginal bone loss, soft tissue response, and esthetics following single immediate implant treatment (IIT) and delayed implant treatment (DIT) in the esthetic zone of the maxilla in well‐selected patients. Materials and Methods: Adequate bone volume and ideal soft tissue level/contour were considered requirements for implant therapy, with additional prerequisites for IIT of residual alveolar bone wall integrity and a thick gingival biotype. IIT included immediate placement and provisionalization, while DIT included extraction socket preservation followed by implant placement and provisionalization 4 months later. Cortical bone levels and peri‐implant mucosal conditions were evaluated at regular intervals. The esthetic outcome was objectively rated after 3 years using the pink esthetic score (PES) and white esthetic score (WES). Results: Twelve patients received an immediate Laser‐Lok® implant, and 13 patients received a delayed Laser‐Lok® implant. No significant differences were found between the study groups regarding survival rate (100%). The mean bone level from the implant/abutment interface was 0.35 ± 0.18 mm for IIT and 0.42 ± 0.21 mm for DIT after 3 years ( p > 0.05). Mesial and distal papillae remained stable over time in DIT. A tendency for regrowth of mesial and distal papillae was found following IIT ( p < 0.05). Midfacial soft tissues remained stable over time following DIT and IIT. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study (e.g., small sample size, short follow‐up duration), the results suggest that regarding success rate, hard/soft tissue responses, and esthetics, DIT and IIT with single Laser‐Lok® implants in the anterior maxilla are comparable and predictable options for well‐selected patients.