Patient preference: a comparison of electronic patient‐completed questionnaires with paper among cancer patients. (20th April 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Martin, P.; Brown, M.C.; Espin‐Garcia, O.; Cuffe, S.; Pringle, D.; Mahler, M.; Villeneuve, J.; Niu, C.; Charow, R.; Lam, C.; Shani, R.M.; Hon, H.; Otsuka, M.; Xu, W.; Alibhai, S.; Jenkinson, J.; Liu, G.
• Is Part Of: European journal of cancer care. Volume 25:Number 2(2016:Mar.)
• Page Start: 334
• Page End: 341
• Publication Date: 2015-04-20
• Subjects: patient -- preference -- tablet -- web -- technologies -- understanding; Cancer -- Nursing -- Periodicals; 616.994
• DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12318
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0961-5423

Abstract

Abstract : In this study, we compared cancer patients preference for computerised (tablet/web‐based) surveys versus paper. We also assessed whether the understanding of a cancer‐related topic, pharmacogenomics is affected by the survey format, and examined differences in demographic and medical characteristics which may affect patient preference and understanding. Three hundred and four cancer patients completed a tablet‐administered survey and another 153 patients completed a paper‐based survey. Patients who participated in the tablet survey were questioned regarding their preference for survey format administration (paper, tablet and web‐based). Understanding was assessed with a 'direct' method, by asking patients to assess their understanding of genetic testing, and with a 'composite' score. Patients preferred administration with tablet (71%) compared with web‐based (12%) and paper (17%). Patients <65 years old, non‐Caucasians and white‐collar professionals significantly preferred the computerised format following multivariate analysis. There was no significant difference in understanding between the paper and tablet survey with direct questioning or composite score. Age (<65 years) and white‐collar professionals were associated with increased understanding (both P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in understanding between the tablet and print survey in a multivariate analysis. Patients overwhelmingly preferred computerised surveys and understanding of pharmacogenomics was not affected by survey format.