A comparative study of models for shear strength of reinforced concrete deep beams. (1st April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Liu, Jian; Mihaylov, Boyan I.
• Is Part Of: Engineering structures. Volume 112(2016:Apr. 01)
• Page Start: 81
• Page End: 89
• Publication Date: 2016-04-01
• Subjects: Deep beams -- Shear strength -- Prediction models -- Statistical comparison -- Parametric study -- Strut-and-tie model -- Kinematic model; Structural engineering -- Periodicals; Structural analysis (Engineering) -- Periodicals; Construction, Technique de la -- Périodiques; Génie parasismique -- Périodiques; Pression du vent -- Périodiques; Earthquake engineering; Structural engineering; Wind-pressure; Periodicals; 624.105
• DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.012
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0141-0296

Abstract

Highlights: Review of shear strength prediction models for RC deep beams published since 1987. Comparisons of ten models with a common database of 574 deep beam tests. Calculation of shear strength by intersecting shear demand and capacity curves. Study of the effects of test variables on the shear strength of deep beams. Abstract: Since the 1960s, researchers have proposed different empirical formulas and analytical models for the shear strength of deep reinforced concrete beams. Some of these approaches have shown adequate accuracy when applied to small sets of beam tests, while their ability to predict the effect of a large range of test variables remains unknown. This paper presents a summary of models for deep beams from 73 publications, and focuses on a detailed evaluation of ten more recent models by using a database of 574 deep beam tests. It is found that a semi-empirical strut-and-tie model (STM) and a two-parameter kinematic theory (2PKT) for deep beams produce the least scattered predictions. The former model produced an average shear strength experimental-to-predicted ratio V exp / V pred of 1.00 with a coefficient of variation (COV) of 19.8%, while the latter resulted in an average of 1.08 with a COV of 15.4%. The two models are also compared by plotting the V exp / V pred ratios against different tests variables, and by performing parametric studies with individual test series. It is shown that the semi-empirical STM exhibits certain bias with respect to the shear-span-to-depth ratio, while the 2PKT produces uniform results across the entire range of experimental data. It is also noted that the semi-empirical STM requires somewhat less computational effort than the 2PKT approach.