Comparisons of dysphagia and quality of life (QOL) in comparable patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer receiving chemo-irradiation or cetuximab-irradiation. (March 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Samuels, Stuart E.; Tao, Yebin; Lyden, Teresa; Haxer, Marc; Spector, Matthew; Malloy, Kelly M.; Prince, Mark E.; Bradford, Carol R.; Worden, Francis P.; Schipper, Matthew; Eisbruch, Avraham
• Is Part Of: Oral oncology. Volume 54(2016:Mar.)
• Page Start: 68
• Page End: 74
• Publication Date: 2016-03
• Subjects: Oropharyngeal cancer -- Quality of life -- Swallowing -- Cetuximab -- Chemo-RT; Mouth -- Cancer -- Periodicals; Mouth -- Tumors -- Periodicals; Mouth Diseases -- Periodicals; Mouth Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Bouche -- Cancer -- Périodiques; Bouche -- Tumeurs -- Périodiques; Tumeurs -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 616.9943105
• DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.12.001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1368-8375

Abstract

Highlights: Outcome of matched patients with good-prognosis oropharyngeal cancer [HPV(+), treated on studies of chemo-RT and cetuximab-RT. Longitudinal evaluations of swallowing, observer and patient-reported dysphagia, and QOL, were made in through 12 months. No significant differences between the arms were observed. These data do not support replacing chemotherapy with cetuximab for treatment de-intensification. Summary: Purpose: Compare functional outcomes of radiotherapy (RT) concurrent with cetuximab (cet-RT) or with chemotherapy (chemo-RT) for comparable, good prognosis patients with human papillomavirus related (HPV+) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Methods: Outcomes of patients with stage III/IV HPV+ OPC patients with minimal smoking history and non-T4/N3/N2C, treated on prospective protocol of RT concurrent with cetuximab (cet-RT), were compared to similar patients on prospective chemo-RT protocols. In both groups, videofluoroscopy (VF), observer rated dysphagia (ORD), and validated QOL questionnaires: xerostomia questionnaire (XQ), head and neck QOL, and University of Washington QOL, were performed periodically and compared to pretreatment. Mixed effects models with adjustment for baseline assessed differences between groups. Results: 26 cet-RT patients were compared to 27 chemo-RT patients with similar baseline characteristics. In the chemo-RT group, no recurrences occurred. In the cet-RT group, 1 patient had persistent microscopic disease on salvage neck dissection and 1 distant failure. Both groups had mild VF-based swallowing dysfunction pre-treatment, worsened at 3 months ( P < 0.02) and persisted at 12 months, not differing between groups ( P > 0.11). For both groups ORD was very low pretreatment, worsened at 3 months and improved at 12 months, without differences between treatment groups ( P = 0.26). QOL Summary and domain scores for eating were good pretreatment, worse at 3 mo, and then improved to near baseline at 12 months, without differences between the groups in any QOL domains ( P > 0.10). Conclusion: Both groups had excellent clinical outcomes without significant differences in objective or subjective functions. These data question using cetuximab instead of chemotherapy for treatment de-intensification for HPV+ OPC.