Light absorption by biomass burning source emissions. (February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cheng, Yuan; Engling, Guenter; Moosmüller, Hans; Arnott, W. Patrick; Chen, Antony L.W.; Wold, Cyle E.; Hao, Wei Min; He, Ke-bin
• Is Part Of: Atmospheric environment. Volume 127(2016)
• Page Start: 347
• Page End: 354
• Publication Date: 2016-02
• Subjects: Biomass burning -- Light absorption -- Black carbon -- Photoacoustic -- Liquid-like organics; Air -- Pollution -- Periodicals; Air -- Pollution -- Meteorological aspects -- Periodicals; 551.51
• DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.045
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1352-2310

Abstract

Abstract: Black carbon (BC) aerosol has relatively short atmospheric lifetimes yet plays a unique and important role in the Earth's climate system, making it an important short-term climate mitigation target. Globally, biomass burning is the largest source of BC emissions into the atmosphere. This study investigated the mass absorption efficiency (MAE) of biomass burning BC generated by controlled combustion of various wildland fuels during the Fire Laboratory at Missoula Experiments (FLAME). MAE values derived from a photoacoustic spectrometer (∼7.8 m 2 /g at a wavelength of 532 nm) were in good agreement with those suggested for uncoated BC when the emission ratios of organic carbon (OC) to elemental carbon (EC) were extremely low (i.e., below 0.3). With the increase of OC/EC, two distinct types of biomass smoke were identified. For the first type, MAE exhibited a positive dependence on OC/EC, while the overestimation of the light absorption coefficient ( b abs ) by a filter-based method was less significant and could be estimated by a nearly constant correction factor. For the second type, MAE was biased low and correlated negatively with OC/EC, while the overestimation of b abs by the filter-based method was much more significant and showed an apparent OC/EC dependence. This study suggests that BC emission factors determined by the commonly used thermal-optical methods might be sustantially overestimated for some types of biomass burning emissions. Our results also indicate that biomass burning emissions may include some liquid-like organics that can significantly bias filter-based b abs measurements. Highlights: Two distinct types of biomass smoke were identified by the MAE vs. OC/EC dependence. They also differed with respect to artifacts in the filter-based b abs measurement. Present assessments of biomass burning BC emissions might be largely overestimated. Biomass burning emissions with high OC/EC ratios may include some liquid-like OM. These liquid-like organic components can complicate filter-based b abs measurements.