Effectiveness of fixed dose combination medication ('polypills') compared with usual care in patients with cardiovascular disease or at high risk: A prospective, individual patient data meta-analysis of 3140 patients in six countries. (15th February 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Effectiveness of fixed dose combination medication ('polypills') compared with usual care in patients with cardiovascular disease or at high risk: A prospective, individual patient data meta-analysis of 3140 patients in six countries. (15th February 2016)
- Main Title:
- Effectiveness of fixed dose combination medication ('polypills') compared with usual care in patients with cardiovascular disease or at high risk: A prospective, individual patient data meta-analysis of 3140 patients in six countries
- Authors:
- Webster, Ruth
Patel, Anushka
Selak, Vanessa
Billot, Laurent
Bots, Michiel L.
Brown, Alex
Bullen, Chris
Cass, Alan
Crengle, Sue
Raina Elley, C.
Grobbee, Diederick E.
Neal, Bruce
Peiris, David
Poulter, Neil
Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
Rafter, Natasha
Stanton, Alice
Stepien, Sandrine
Thom, Simon
Usherwood, Tim
Wadham, Angela
Rodgers, Anthony - Abstract:
- Abstract: Aims: To conduct a prospective, individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing a polypill-based approach with usual care in high risk individuals. Methods and results: Three trials comparing polypill-based care with usual care in individuals with CVD or high calculated cardiovascular risk contributed IPD. Primary outcomes were self-reported adherence to combination therapy (anti-platelet, statin and ≥ two blood pressure (BP) lowering agents), and difference in mean systolic BP (SBP) and LDL-cholesterol at 12 months. Analyses used random effects models. Among 3140 patients from Australia, England, India, Ireland, New Zealand and The Netherlands (75% male, mean age 62 years), median follow-up was 15 months. At baseline, 84%, 87% and 61% respectively were taking a statin, anti-platelet agent and at least two BP lowering agents. At 12 months, compared to usual care, participants in the polypill arm had higher adherence to combination therapy (80% vs. 50%, RR 1.58; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.90; p < 0.001), lower SBP (− 2.5 mmHg; 95% CI, − 4.5 to − 0.4; p = 0.02) and lower LDL-cholesterol (− 0.1 mmol/L; 95% CI, − 0.2 to 0.0; p = 0.04). Baseline treatment levels were a major effect modifier for adherence and SBP (p-homog < 0.0001 and 0.02 respectively) with greatest improvements seen among those under-treated at baseline. Conclusions: Polypill therapy significantly improved adherence, SBP and LDL-cholesterol in high risk patientsAbstract: Aims: To conduct a prospective, individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing a polypill-based approach with usual care in high risk individuals. Methods and results: Three trials comparing polypill-based care with usual care in individuals with CVD or high calculated cardiovascular risk contributed IPD. Primary outcomes were self-reported adherence to combination therapy (anti-platelet, statin and ≥ two blood pressure (BP) lowering agents), and difference in mean systolic BP (SBP) and LDL-cholesterol at 12 months. Analyses used random effects models. Among 3140 patients from Australia, England, India, Ireland, New Zealand and The Netherlands (75% male, mean age 62 years), median follow-up was 15 months. At baseline, 84%, 87% and 61% respectively were taking a statin, anti-platelet agent and at least two BP lowering agents. At 12 months, compared to usual care, participants in the polypill arm had higher adherence to combination therapy (80% vs. 50%, RR 1.58; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.90; p < 0.001), lower SBP (− 2.5 mmHg; 95% CI, − 4.5 to − 0.4; p = 0.02) and lower LDL-cholesterol (− 0.1 mmol/L; 95% CI, − 0.2 to 0.0; p = 0.04). Baseline treatment levels were a major effect modifier for adherence and SBP (p-homog < 0.0001 and 0.02 respectively) with greatest improvements seen among those under-treated at baseline. Conclusions: Polypill therapy significantly improved adherence, SBP and LDL-cholesterol in high risk patients compared with usual care, especially among those who were under-treated at baseline. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of cardiology. Volume 205(2016)
- Journal:
- International journal of cardiology
- Issue:
- Volume 205(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 205, Issue 2016 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 205
- Issue:
- 2016
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0205-2016-0000
- Page Start:
- 147
- Page End:
- 156
- Publication Date:
- 2016-02-15
- Subjects:
- Meta-analysis -- Polypill -- Secondary prevention -- Cardiovascular disease
Cardiology -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.12 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/01675273 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01675273 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.12.015 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0167-5273
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.158000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 1551.xml