The effect of alternative accounting measurement bases on investors' assessments of managers' stewardship. (October 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Anderson, Spencer B.; Brown, Jason L.; Hodder, Leslie; Hopkins, Patrick E.
• Is Part Of: Accounting, organizations and society. Volume 46(2015)
• Page Start: 100
• Page End: 114
• Publication Date: 2015-10
• Subjects: Stewardship -- Fair value -- Experimental market -- Transparency -- Comparability -- Attribution theory; Accounting -- Periodicals; Social accounting -- Periodicals; Comptabilité -- Périodiques; Bilan social -- Périodiques; 657.05
• DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2015.03.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0361-3682

Abstract

Abstract: We conduct a laboratory experiment to examine investors' assessments of managers' stewardship. We provide evidence that investors tend to attribute external (i.e., non-manager-related) causes of firm performance to managers' performance. We predict and find that fair value information enables investors to overcome this tendency and make better stewardship decisions than investors with amortized cost information. We also find that investors presented with amortized-cost-based financial statements perform better to the extent they access fair-value-based footnote information, while investors presented with fair-value-based financial statements perform worse to the extent they access amortized-cost-based footnote information. Collectively, our results suggest that investors' stewardship decisions are improved because fair value information more transparently provides the information required to properly consider the opportunity costs associated with managers' actions and disentangle endogenous actions by managers from exogenous market forces that are outside of managers' control.