Call now or later? The waiting game in decision-making. (2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Klein, Joseph
• Is Part Of: International journal of educational research. Volume 74(2015)
• Page Start: 38
• Page End: 48
• Publication Date: 2015
• Subjects: Teachers -- Decision making -- Judgment -- Cognition; Education -- Evaluation -- Periodicals; Curriculum evaluation -- Periodicals; Education -- Periodicals; Program Evaluation -- Periodicals; Éducation -- Évaluation -- Périodiques; Programmes d'études -- Evaluation -- Périodiques; Éducation -- Recherche -- Périodiques; Curriculum evaluation; Education -- Evaluation; Periodicals; 370.72
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2015.09.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0883-0355

Abstract

Highlights: There is no consensus on the positive effect of a delay in decision making. Previous work was conducted on decisions that have a single solution. Delay in educational decisions with many choices have not been studied. Some participants improved their educational decisions after a night's sleep. Improvement was seen in data gathering, search for alternatives, and other details. Practical implications for improvement of the work of teachers were discussed. Abstract: Purpose: Opinions in the literature are divided as to whether the quality of judgment in a decision-making situation improves with a delay involving no conscious contemplation of the subject. This question has been examined in economic decisions with precise evaluative mathematical criteria but not in less defined areas such as education. The paper introduces the issue by asking whether the very act of delaying educational decision making, without additional consideration of the subject in the interim, contributes to improvement of the quality of the decision. Research design: 165 high school teachers were asked to make decisions about each of two educational cases, once immediately after reading about the issues and again the next day after a night's sleep. Measures were taken to ensure that the cases would not be discussed during the two time points. Utilization of the main components of the decision making process during the immediate and delayed responses was compared. Findings: Comparison of the immediate and deferred decisions revealed differing degrees of significant improvement in the delayed conclusion with regard to most of the components measured. Conclusions: In the decision making process model the time dimension should be included. To utilize individual abilities in decision making, educators should weigh decisions through a gradual process. Immediate finalization should be avoided when possible. Implications for research and practice: The significance of the findings is discussed in terms of improving the decision making culture of educational institutions. Additional research directions are proposed.