Landing the blame: The influence of EU Member States on quota setting. (February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Carpenter, Griffin; Kleinjans, Richard; Villasante, Sebastian; O'Leary, Bethan C.
• Is Part Of: Marine policy. Volume 64(2016)
• Page Start: 9
• Page End: 15
• Publication Date: 2016-02
• Subjects: Total allowable catch -- Decision-making processes -- Common Fisheries Policy -- Political economy; Marine resources -- Economic aspects -- Periodicals; Fisheries -- Periodicals; Ressources marines -- Aspect économique -- Périodiques; Pêches -- Périodiques; Fisheries; Marine resources -- Economic aspects; Periodicals; 333.916405
• DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.11.001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0308-597X

Abstract

Abstract: Fisheries in European Union (EU) waters have been managed under the Common Fisheries Policy since 1983. The main regulatory tool in EU fisheries management is the use of Total Allowable Catches (TACs). In principle, TACs are set according to biological scientific advice provided by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) which recommends catch limits with the objective of maximising catches in a sustainable manner. The objective of this paper is to compare TACs set by the EU and its Member States between 2001 and 2015 with those recommended by ICES in their annual scientific advice in order to (a) investigate the level of compliance with scientific advice by the European Council and, (b) consider whether particular Member States have received more TACs above advice than others. For the time-series analysed, the European Council set TACs above scientific advice by an average of 20% per year, with around 7 out of every 10 TACs exceeding advice. Of all Member States, Denmark and the United Kingdom received the highest TACs in volume above scientific advice. Relative to the size of their TAC however, Spain and Portugal exceeded advice by the greatest percentage. Greater transparency is required to determine what takes place during the closed door negotiations and to improve the fishery sustainability credentials of the EU and its Member States. Highlights: Total allowable catches (TACs) are a central tool for EU fisheries management. On average, EU TACs were set 20% above scientific advice between 2001 and 2015. Denmark and the UK received the largest increase to their TACs (in tonnes). Spain and Portugal received the largest percentage increase to their TAC. Greater transparency in decision-making is required.