The feasibility and acceptability of a brief Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) group intervention for people with psychosis: The 'ACT for life' study. (March 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Johns, Louise C.; Oliver, Joseph E.; Khondoker, Mizanur; Byrne, Majella; Jolley, Suzanne; Wykes, Til; Joseph, Candice; Butler, Lucy; Craig, Thomas; Morris, Eric M.J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry. Volume 50(2016)
• Page Start: 257
• Page End: 263
• Publication Date: 2016-03
• Subjects: Schizophrenia -- Cognitive therapy -- Community mental health -- Early psychosis -- Mindfulness -- Contextual behavioral science; Behavior therapy -- Periodicals; 616.89142
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.10.001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0005-7916

Abstract

Abstract: Background and objectives: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a contextual cognitive-behavioural approach with a developing evidence base for clinical and cost-effectiveness as an individually-delivered intervention to promote recovery from psychosis. ACT also lends itself to brief group delivery, potentially increasing access to therapy without inflating costs. This study examined, for the first time, the feasibility and acceptability of ACT groups for people with psychosis (G-ACTp). Methods: Participants were recruited from community psychosis teams. Ratings of user satisfaction, and pre-post change in self-rated functioning (primary outcome), mood (secondary outcome) and ACT processes were all completed with an independent assessor. Of 89 people recruited, 83 completed pre measures, 69 started the four-week G-ACTp intervention, and 65 completed post measures. Results: Independently assessed acceptability and satisfaction were high. Functioning (Coeff. = -2.4, z = −2.9, p = 0.004; 95% CI: -4.0 to −0.8; within subject effect size (ES) d = 0.4) and mood (Coeff. = -2.3, z = −3.5, p = 0.001; 95% CI: -3.5 to −1.0; d = 0.4) improved from baseline to follow-up. Commensurate changes in targeted ACT processes were consistent with the underlying model. Limitations: The uncontrolled, pre-post design precluded blinded assessments, and may have inflated effect sizes. Participants may have improved as a result of other factors, and findings require replication in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Conclusions: This preliminary study showed that brief group ACT interventions for people with psychosis are feasible and acceptable. Uncontrolled, pre-post assessments suggest small clinical improvements, and changes in psychological processes consistent with an ACT model. Replication in an RCT is required, before implementation can be recommended. Highlights: We evaluated brief group Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for psychosis (G-ACTp). Groups were delivered in frontline community mental health services. Satisfaction rates were high, and the intervention was both feasible and acceptable. Improvements in clinical outcomes show potential for cost-effective implementation. Changes in targeted psychological processes suggest candidate mechanisms of action.