The psychology of whistleblowing. (December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dungan, James; Waytz, Adam; Young, Liane
• Is Part Of: Current opinion in psychology. Volume 6(2015)
• Page Start: 129
• Page End: 133
• Publication Date: 2015-12
• Subjects: Psychology -- Periodicals; 150.5
• DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2352-250X

Abstract

Highlights: Whistleblowing represents a tradeoff between fairness and loyalty. Personal, situational, and cultural factors stemming from this tradeoff influence whistleblowing. Prioritizing constructive dissent can encourage whistleblowing. Abstract : Whistleblowing — reporting another person's unethical behavior to a third party — represents an ethical quandary. In some cases whistleblowing appears heroic whereas in other cases it appears reprehensible. This article describes how the decision to blow the whistle rests on the tradeoff that people make between fairness and loyalty. When fairness increases in value, whistleblowing is more likely whereas when loyalty increases in value, whistleblowing is less likely. Furthermore, we describe systematic personal, situational, and cultural factors stemming from the fairness-loyalty tradeoff that drive whistleblowing. Finally, we describe how minimizing this tradeoff and prioritizing constructive dissent can encourage whistleblowing and strengthen collectives.