Violet stimulated luminescence: geo- or thermochronometer?. (October 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ankjærgaard, C.; Guralnik, B.; Porat, N.; Heimann, A.; Jain, M.; Wallinga, J.
• Is Part Of: Radiation measurements. Volume 81(2015:Oct.)
• Page Start: 78
• Page End: 84
• Publication Date: 2015-10
• Subjects: Violet stimulated luminescence -- VSL dating -- Palaeosol -- OSL-thermochronometry -- Hydrothermal fluids -- Golan plateau; Nuclear emulsions -- Periodicals; Particle tracks (Nuclear physics) -- Periodicals; Thermoluminescence -- Periodicals; Cosmic rays -- Periodicals; Radiation -- Measurement -- Periodicals; Radiometry -- Periodicals; Radiation Monitoring -- Periodicals; Émulsions nucléaires -- Périodiques; Particules (Physique nucléaire) -- Traces -- Périodiques; Thermoluminescence -- Périodiques; Rayonnement cosmique -- Périodiques; Radiométrie -- Périodiques; 539.77
• DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2015.01.011
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1350-4487

Abstract

Abstract: The method of quartz optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating is widely used, but generally limited to the past ∼0.1 million years (Ma) due to early saturation of the desired signal. Violet stimulated luminescence (VSL) of quartz has previously been shown as a promising alternative, with a dose saturation level ∼20 times higher compared to that of OSL, excellent thermal stability on the 10 11 year time scale, and agreement between VSL and OSL ages up to ∼0.3 Ma. Here we explore the usability of the VSL signal to date older quartz samples from palaeosols, whose ages are bracketed by K–Ar ages and palaeomagnetic data of the interbedded basalts, emplaced between 1.6 and 0.7 Ma. VSL ages from three palaeosols largely underestimate the independent ages of their overlying basalts. This can be explained either by a low-temperature thermal anomaly resetting the VSL signal in nature, and/or by an insufficient measurement protocol, unable to correctly translate the natural signal into the equivalent laboratory dose. Highlights: We investigate the potential of VSL to date quartz from early Quaternary palaeosols (1.6 - 0.7 Ma old). The VSL signals show good reproducibility, dose response, thermal stability, and dose recovery. VSL ages from three palaeosols underestimate the independent K-Ar ages by 50% or more. It is possible that the VSL ages are correct, but have been reset by thermal anomalies. Further investigation of the natural VSL signal is needed to confirm these underestimating ages.