3D surface-based registration of ultrasound and histology in prostate cancer imaging. (January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schalk, Stefan G.; Postema, Arnoud; Saidov, Tamerlan A.; Demi, Libertario; Smeenge, Martijn; de la Rosette, Jean J.M.C.H.; Wijkstra, Hessel; Mischi, Massimo
• Is Part Of: Computerized medical imaging and graphics. Volume 47(2016)
• Page Start: 29
• Page End: 39
• Publication Date: 2016-01
• Subjects: 3D registration -- Prostate -- Ultrasound -- Histology -- Deformable model -- Elastic registration; Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals; Imaging systems in medicine -- Periodicals; Diagnosis, Radioscopic -- Data processing -- Periodicals; Diagnostic Imaging -- Periodicals; Imagerie pour le diagnostic -- Périodiques; Diagnostic imaging; Periodicals; Electronic journals; Electronic journals; 616.0754
• DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.11.001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0895-6111

Abstract

Abstract : Highlights: We developed a 3D, surface-based, elastic registration algorithm for histology and TRUS imaging. To maximize clinical applicability, no auxiliary sensors or dedicated tools were used. Several registration techniques were tested during different steps of the algorithm. The algorithm was validated in vitro in two gelatin phantoms and in vivo in 7 patients. The resulting target registration errors were 1.5 ± 0.2 and 2.1 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. Abstract: Several transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-based techniques aiming at accurate localization of prostate cancer are emerging to improve diagnostics or to assist with focal therapy. However, precise validation prior to introduction into clinical practice is required. Histopathology after radical prostatectomy provides an excellent ground truth, but needs accurate registration with imaging. In this work, a 3D, surface-based, elastic registration method was developed to fuse TRUS images with histopathologic results. To maximize the applicability in clinical practice, no auxiliary sensors or dedicated hardware were used for the registration. The mean registration errors, measured in vitro and in vivo, were 1.5 ± 0.2 and 2.1 ± 0.5 mm, respectively.