Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by parents in their children and adolescents with epilepsy – Prevelance, predictors and parents' assessment. (January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hartmann, Nicole; Neininger, Martina P.; Bernhard, Matthias K.; Syrbe, Steffen; Nickel, Petra; Merkenschlager, Andreas; Kiess, Wieland; Bertsche, Thilo; Bertsche, Astrid
• Is Part Of: European journal of paediatric neurology. Volume 20:Number 1(2016:Jan.)
• Page Start: 11
• Page End: 19
• Publication Date: 2016-01
• Subjects: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) -- Homeopathy -- Osteopathy -- Children -- Epilepsy; CAM complementary and alternative medicine -- ADE adverse drug events; Pediatric neurology -- Periodicals; Nervous System Diseases -- Periodicals; Child -- Periodicals; Infant -- Periodicals; Neurologie pédiatrique -- Périodiques; Pediatric neurology; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 618.928
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2015.11.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1090-3798

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is popular. Parents of children suffering from epilepsy may also consider administering CAM to their children. Systematic data about frequency of and motivations for CAM use, however, are scarce. Methods: In a university hospital's neuropaediatric department parents of patients aged 0–18 years suffering from epilepsy were consecutively invited to take part in a structured interview during 4 months in 2014. Results: Of the invited parents, 164/165 (99%) agreed to participate. From those, 21/164 (13%) stated that they used CAM in their child. The highest independent predictive value of CAM use was the occurrence of adverse drug events (ADE) of anticonvulsants as judged by parents. Patients affected by ADE had a 5.6 higher chance of receiving CAM compared to patients without ADE. Most commonly used were homeopathy (14/21, 67%) and osteopathy (12/21, 57%). The internet was the most frequently used source of information (14/21, 67%). Of the parents, 10/21 (48%) described positive effects of CAM on seizure frequency, 12/21 (57%) on general condition of their child, and 20/21 (95%) wished to continue CAM for epilepsy therapy. From the non-users of CAM, 91/143 (66%) expressed the desire to learn more about CAM for epilepsy therapy. Limitations: Our study was performed in a university hospital in a large urban city in Eastern Germany. CAM user rates can differ in other parts of Germany and Europe, in other institutions and for chronic diseases other than epilepsy. Conclusion: The main reason for CAM use was the occurrence of ADE of anticonvulsants. More than half of the parents saw a benefit of CAM for their children. Almost all parents wished to continue CAM use, even those who did not see concrete positive effects. Highlights: 13% of parents used alternative medicine for epilepsy treatment of their child. Anticonvulsants' side effects were the main reason for use of alternative medicine. About half of the parents reported positive effects of alternative medicine. Parents not reporting such a positive outcome also continued alternative medicine. Non-users of alternative medicine wished for information on it.