The Contemporary Safety and Effectiveness of Lower Extremity Bypass Surgery and Peripheral Endovascular Interventions in the Treatment of Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease. Issue 21 (24th November 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The Contemporary Safety and Effectiveness of Lower Extremity Bypass Surgery and Peripheral Endovascular Interventions in the Treatment of Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease. Issue 21 (24th November 2015)
- Main Title:
- The Contemporary Safety and Effectiveness of Lower Extremity Bypass Surgery and Peripheral Endovascular Interventions in the Treatment of Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease
- Authors:
- Tsai, Thomas T.
Rehring, Thomas F.
Rogers, R. Kevin
Shetterly, Susan M.
Wagner, Nicole M.
Gupta, Rajan
Jazaeri, Omid
Hedayati, Nasim
Jones, W. Schuyler
Patel, Manesh R.
Ho, P. Michael
Go, Alan S.
Magid, David J. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background—: Treatment for symptomatic peripheral artery disease includes lower extremity bypass surgery (LEB) and peripheral endovascular interventions (PVIs); however, limited comparative effectiveness data exist between the 2 therapies. We assessed the safety and effectiveness of LEB and PVI in patients with symptomatic claudication and critical limb ischemia. Methods and Results—: In a community-based clinical registry at 2 large integrated healthcare delivery systems, we compared 883 patients undergoing PVI and 975 patients undergoing LEB between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2011. Rates of target lesion revascularization were greater for PVI than for LEB in patients presenting with claudication (12.3±2.7% and 19.0±3.5% at 1 and 3 years versus 5.2±2.4% and 8.3±3.1%, log-rank P <0.001) and critical limb ischemia (19.1±4.8% and 31.6±6.3% at 1 and 3 years versus 10.8±2.5% and 16.0±3.2%, log-rank P <0.001). However, in comparison with PVI, LEB was associated with increased rates of complications up to 30 days following the procedure (37.1% versus 11.9%, P <0.001). There were no differences in amputation rates between the 2 groups. Findings remained consistent in sensitivity analyses by using propensity methods to account for treatment selection. Conclusions—: In patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease, in comparison with LEB, PVI was associated with fewer 30-day procedural complications, higher revascularization rates at 1 and 3 years, and noAbstract : Background—: Treatment for symptomatic peripheral artery disease includes lower extremity bypass surgery (LEB) and peripheral endovascular interventions (PVIs); however, limited comparative effectiveness data exist between the 2 therapies. We assessed the safety and effectiveness of LEB and PVI in patients with symptomatic claudication and critical limb ischemia. Methods and Results—: In a community-based clinical registry at 2 large integrated healthcare delivery systems, we compared 883 patients undergoing PVI and 975 patients undergoing LEB between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2011. Rates of target lesion revascularization were greater for PVI than for LEB in patients presenting with claudication (12.3±2.7% and 19.0±3.5% at 1 and 3 years versus 5.2±2.4% and 8.3±3.1%, log-rank P <0.001) and critical limb ischemia (19.1±4.8% and 31.6±6.3% at 1 and 3 years versus 10.8±2.5% and 16.0±3.2%, log-rank P <0.001). However, in comparison with PVI, LEB was associated with increased rates of complications up to 30 days following the procedure (37.1% versus 11.9%, P <0.001). There were no differences in amputation rates between the 2 groups. Findings remained consistent in sensitivity analyses by using propensity methods to account for treatment selection. Conclusions—: In patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease, in comparison with LEB, PVI was associated with fewer 30-day procedural complications, higher revascularization rates at 1 and 3 years, and no difference in subsequent amputations. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Circulation. Volume 132:Issue 21(2015)
- Journal:
- Circulation
- Issue:
- Volume 132:Issue 21(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 132, Issue 21 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 132
- Issue:
- 21
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0132-0021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-11-24
- Subjects:
- comparative effectiveness research -- lower extremity bypass surgery -- peripheral arterial disease
Blood -- Circulation -- Periodicals
Cardiovascular system -- Periodicals
Cardiology -- Periodicals
Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Blood Circulation
Cardiovascular System
Vascular Diseases
616.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/sp-3.4.2a/ovidweb.cgi?&S=HFFJFPCLPODDKOLGNCALDCMCIACKAA00&Browse=Toc+Children%7cNO%7cS.sh.1384_1326796138_84.1384_1326796138_96.1384_1326796138_97%7c66%7c50 ↗
http://www.circulationaha.org ↗
http://circ.ahajournals.org/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013440 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0009-7322
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3265.200000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2875.xml