The Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFST) and measures of cognitive functioning. (January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Downey, Luke A.; Hayley, Amie C.; Porath-Waller, Amy J.; Boorman, Martin; Stough, Con
• Is Part Of: Accident analysis and prevention. Volume 86(2016)
• Page Start: 90
• Page End: 98
• Publication Date: 2016-01
• Subjects: Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFST) -- Cognition -- Memory -- Psychomotor -- Attention -- CDR; Accidents -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Accident Prevention -- Periodicals; Accidents -- Prévention -- Périodiques; 363.106
• DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.019
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0001-4575

Abstract

Highlights: The Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFST) are used to predict driver impairment. Links between SFST and computerised measures of cognitive performance were assessed. Performance on SFST sub-tests was correlated with behavioural aspects of cognition. The SFST are a practical tool for detecting behavioural deficits in driving ability. Abstract: Objective: The Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFST) are utilised widely to assess fitness to drive when law enforcement suspects a driver's ability to drive is impaired, whether by drugs or alcohol. The SFST ostensibly achieve this through assessment of the level of drivers' cognitive and psychomotor impairment, although no studies have explicitly assessed the relatedness of cognitive ability and performance on the SFST. The current study aimed to assess the relationship between the three components of the SFST with a well validated computerised cognitive battery. Method: A sub-set of 61 placebo condition participants comprised the sample, with 33 females and 28 males (mean age 25.45 years). Correlations between the individual SFST subscales 'Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus' (HGN), the 'One Leg Stand' (OLS) and the 'Walk and Turn' test (WAT) and Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) sub-scales of 'Quality of Working Memory', 'Power of Attention' and 'Continuity of Attention' were analysed using point-biserial correlation. Results: Sixty participants were included for analyses. A weak–moderate positive (five subscales) and a moderate–strong negative (two subscales) association was noted between seven of the nine individual CDR subscales and the SFST subscale of the WAT test (all p < 0.05). Individually, a moderate positive association was noted between the sub-scale 'Nystagmus lack of smooth pursuit' and 'digit vigilance reaction time' and 'choice reaction time; reaction time' (both p < 0.05) and 'Nystagmus head move and/or jerk' and 'simple reaction time' ( p < 0.001). When assessed as a partially composite factor, a comparable association was also noted between the composite score of the SFST subscale 'Nystagmus head move and/or jerk' and both (a) simple and (b) digit vigilance reaction time (both p < 0.05). No association was noted between any of the individual cognitive variables and the SFST subscale 'OLS', or between composite cognitive scores 'Quality of Working Memory', 'Power of Attention' and 'Continuity of Attention' and total SFST scores. Discussion: Variation in some aspects of cognitive performance was found to be moderately and positively correlated with some individual aspects of the SFST; particularly among tasks which assess reaction time. Impairment of these cognitive processes can also contribute to the completion of complex tasks such as driving or the SFST. Complex behavioural tasks such as driving are often severely impaired due to intoxication, and thus in a practical sense, the SFST can still be considered a useful screening tool to identify drug or alcohol impaired drivers.