Procedural characteristics and adverse events in diagnostic and interventional catheterisations in paediatric and adult CHD: initial report from the IMPACT Registry. (23rd February 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vincent, Robert N.; Moore, John; Beekman, Robert H.; Benson, Lee; Bergersen, Lisa; Holzer, Ralf; Jayaram, Natalie; Jenkins, Kathy; Ringel, Richard; Rome, Jonathan; Martin, Gerard R.
• Is Part Of: Cardiology in the young. Volume 26:Number 1(2016)
• Page Start: 70
• Page End: 78
• Publication Date: 2015-02-23
• Subjects: IMPACT Registry, -- quality improvement, -- cardiac catheterisation; Pediatric cardiology -- Periodicals; 618.9212
• DOI: 10.1017/S1047951114002637
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1047-9511

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: To report procedural characteristics and adverse events on data collected in the registry. Background: The IMPACT – IMproving Paediatric and Adult Congenital Treatment – Registry is a catheterisation registry of paediatric and adult patients with CHD undergoing diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterisation. We are reporting the procedural characteristics and adverse events of patients undergoing diagnostic and interventional catheterisation procedures from January, 2011 to March, 2013. Methods: Demographic, clinical, procedural, and institutional data elements were collected at the participating centres and entered via either a web-based platform or software provided by American College of Cardiology-certified vendors, and were collected in a secure, centralised database. Centre participation was voluntary. Results: During the time frame of data collection, 19, 797 procedures were entered into the IMPACT Registry. Procedures were classified as diagnostic only (35.4%); one of six specific interventions (23.8%); other or multiple interventions (40.7%); and were further broken down into four age groups. Anaesthesia was used in 84.1% of diagnostic procedures and 87.8% of interventional ones. Adverse events occurred in 10.0% of diagnostic and 11.1% of interventional procedures. Conclusions: The IMPACT Registry is gathering data to set national benchmarks for diagnostic and certain specific interventional procedures. We are seeing little differences in procedural characteristics or adverse events in diagnostic procedures compared with interventional procedures overall, but there is significant variation in adverse events amongst age categories. Risk stratification and patient acuity scores will be required for further analysis of these differences.