The interfascicular matrix enables fascicle sliding and recovery in tendon, and behaves more elastically in energy storing tendons. (December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Thorpe, Chavaunne T.; Godinho, Marta S.C.; Riley, Graham P.; Birch, Helen L.; Clegg, Peter D.; Screen, Hazel R.C.
• Is Part Of: Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. Volume 52(2015)
• Page Start: 85
• Page End: 94
• Publication Date: 2015-12
• Subjects: CDET common digital extensor tendon -- CSA cross sectional area -- IFM interfascicular matrix -- PBS phosphate buffered saline -- SDFT superficial digital flexor tendon.; Viscoelastic -- Fatigue -- Mechanics -- Structure-function -- Fascicle -- Endotenon; Biomedical materials -- Periodicals; Biomedical materials -- Mechanical properties -- Periodicals; Biomedical materials; Biomedical materials -- Mechanical properties; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.28
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.04.009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1751-6161

Abstract

Abstract: While the predominant function of all tendons is to transfer force from muscle to bone and position the limbs, some tendons additionally function as energy stores, reducing the cost of locomotion. Energy storing tendons experience extremely high strains and need to be able to recoil efficiently for maximum energy storage and return. In the equine forelimb, the energy storing superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT) has much higher failure strains than the positional common digital extensor tendon (CDET). However, we have previously shown that this is not due to differences in the properties of the SDFT and CDET fascicles (the largest tendon subunits). Instead, there is a greater capacity for interfascicular sliding in the SDFT which facilitates the greater extensions in this particular tendon (Thorpe et al., 2012 ). In the current study, we exposed fascicles and interfascicular matrix (IFM) from the SDFT and CDET to cyclic loading followed by a test to failure. The results show that IFM mechanical behaviour is not a result of irreversible deformation, but the IFM is able to withstand cyclic loading, and is more elastic in the SDFT than in the CDET. We also assessed the effect of ageing on IFM properties, demonstrating that the IFM is less able to resist repetitive loading as it ages, becoming stiffer with increasing age in the SDFT. These results provide further indications that the IFM is important for efficient function in energy storing tendons, and age-related alterations to the IFM may compromise function and predispose older tendons to injury. Highlights: Fascicle sliding enables high levels of extension in energy storing tendons. Sliding mechanics are governed by the interfascicular matrix (IFM). We assessed IFM extension and recovery. IFM elasticity and recovery are greater in energy storing tendons. The IFM plays an important role in the function of energy storing tendons.