Use of a computer-based provider order entry (CPOE) intervention to optimize laboratory testing in patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Issue 5 (November 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Samuelson, Bethany T.; Glynn, Emily; Holmes, Meredith; White, Andrew A.; Martin, Daniel B.; Garcia, David
• Is Part Of: Thrombosis research. Volume 136:Issue 5(2015)
• Page Start: 928
• Page End: 931
• Publication Date: 2015-11
• Subjects: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia -- Computer-based provider order entry -- 4Ts score -- Inappropriate testing; Thrombosis -- Periodicals; 616.135
• DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.09.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0049-3848

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare but frequently considered diagnosis in hospitalized patients. Despite the availability of clinical prediction tools, HIT is often over-diagnosed and patients can be subjected to unnecessary and expensive testing. Methods: A decision-support tool requiring providers to calculate the 4Ts (HIT risk) score prior to ordering laboratory-based tests for anti-PF4/heparin antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing was implemented at our institution in January 2014. Charts of adult patients who underwent ELISA or serotonin release assay (SRA) testing during the 8-month time periods prior to and following this intervention were reviewed and 4Ts scores at the time of ELISA or SRA testing were calculated. Results: A total of 443 ELISA and SRA tests were sent for 411 patients during the time periods studied. We observed a significant decrease from 43 tests/month before to 22 tests/month (p < 0.001) after the intervention. A total of 337 charts were reviewed. We observed a trend toward decrease in the proportion of tested patients with low 4Ts scores (66% vs 56%, p = 0.069), as well as an increase in the average 4Ts score of tested patients (3.0 vs 3.4, p = 0.010) following our intervention. Discussion: Over-testing and treatment for HIT are frequent and potentially harmful occurrences in hospitalized patients. Our study demonstrates that a clinical decision support tool embedded within the electronic ordering process can decrease unnecessary testing for HIT. Highlights: Over-testing and treatment for HIT are frequent occurrences in hospitalized patients. Clinical decision support tools embedded within CPOE can decrease testing rates. Offering SRA reflexively, contingent upon positive ELISA can decrease HIT testing.