Differences in the Pathological Diagnosis and Repeat Craniotomy Rates in Cerebral Tumors Undergoing Biopsy or Resection in an Urban Versus Regional Center. Issue 47 (November 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vonhoff, Craig R.; Lochhead, Alistair; Koustais, Stavros; Watson, Nicole; Andrici, Juliana; Brewer, Janice; Gill, Anthony J.
• Other Names: Guo. Hao section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 94:Issue 47(2015)
• Publication Date: 2015-11
• Subjects: Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002131
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract : Abstract: Primary intracranial tumors occur with an incidence of between 2.5 and 6 per 100, 000 individuals. They require specialist expertise for investigation and management including input from radiology, pathology, neurosurgery, and oncology. Therefore, most patients with intracranial neoplasia are investigated and managed in larger hospitals. The geographically dispersed population of Australia has facilitated the development of neurosurgical units in regional areas. However, major metropolitan hospitals are over-represented compared with regional centers in most research cohorts. We therefore sought to investigate the spectrum of intracranial neoplasms undergoing biopsy and surgery at a major regional center in Australia and to compare the demographic and pathological features to similar cohorts treated in major metropolitan hospitals. We searched the pathological databases of both a major regional pathology provider and a major metropolitan pathology practice, which provides surgical pathology services for both a large private and a large public neurosurgical hospital, to identify all cerebral tumors undergoing biopsy or resection over a 14-year period (calendar years 2001 and 2014). In all, 3717 cerebral tumors were identified. Among them, 51% were from an urban private hospital, 33% from an urban public hospital, and 16% from a regional public hospital. Overall, one-third of them were neuroepithelial in origin, a quarter metastatic disease, a fifth meningeal, and one-tenth were pituitary adenomas. The regional center treated a higher proportion of metastatic tumors and less meningeal tumors compared with the urban center. Additionally, patients were less likely to undergo a second operation in the regional center ( P < 0.001). The differences give an important insight into the burden of neurosurgical disease in regional Australia, and how it differs from that encountered in large metropolitan centers.