Randomized clinical trial comparing long‐term quality of life for Billroth I versus Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Issue 4 (3rd February 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Randomized clinical trial comparing long‐term quality of life for Billroth I versus Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Issue 4 (3rd February 2016)
- Main Title:
- Randomized clinical trial comparing long‐term quality of life for Billroth I versus Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer
- Authors:
- Nakamura, M.
Nakamori, M.
Ojima, T.
Iwahashi, M.
Horiuchi, T.
Kobayashi, Y.
Yamade, N.
Shimada, K.
Oka, M.
Yamaue, H. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Patients' quality of life (QoL) deteriorates remarkably after gastrectomy. Billroth I reconstruction following distal gastrectomy has the physiological advantage of allowing food to pass through the duodenum. It was hypothesized that Billroth I reconstruction would be superior to Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction in terms of long‐term QoL after distal gastrectomy. This study compared two reconstructions in a multicentre prospective randomized clinical trial to identify the optimal reconstruction procedure. Methods: Between January 2009 and September 2010, patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer were randomized during surgery to Billroth I or Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction. The primary endpoint was assessment of QoL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Gastric (FACT‐Ga) questionnaire 36 months after surgery. Results: A total of 122 patients were enrolled in the study, 60 to Billroth I and 62 to Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative complications or mortality, and no significant differences in FACT‐Ga total score ( P = 0·496). Symptom scales such as epigastric fullness (heaviness), diarrhoea and fatigue were significantly better in the Billroth I group at 36 months after gastrectomy (heaviness, P = 0·040; diarrhoea, P = 0·046; fatigue, P = 0·029). The rate of weight loss in the third year was lower for patients in the Billroth I group ( P = 0·046). Conclusion: The choice ofAbstract: Background: Patients' quality of life (QoL) deteriorates remarkably after gastrectomy. Billroth I reconstruction following distal gastrectomy has the physiological advantage of allowing food to pass through the duodenum. It was hypothesized that Billroth I reconstruction would be superior to Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction in terms of long‐term QoL after distal gastrectomy. This study compared two reconstructions in a multicentre prospective randomized clinical trial to identify the optimal reconstruction procedure. Methods: Between January 2009 and September 2010, patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer were randomized during surgery to Billroth I or Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction. The primary endpoint was assessment of QoL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Gastric (FACT‐Ga) questionnaire 36 months after surgery. Results: A total of 122 patients were enrolled in the study, 60 to Billroth I and 62 to Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative complications or mortality, and no significant differences in FACT‐Ga total score ( P = 0·496). Symptom scales such as epigastric fullness (heaviness), diarrhoea and fatigue were significantly better in the Billroth I group at 36 months after gastrectomy (heaviness, P = 0·040; diarrhoea, P = 0·046; fatigue, P = 0·029). The rate of weight loss in the third year was lower for patients in the Billroth I group ( P = 0·046). Conclusion: The choice of anastomotic reconstruction after distal gastrectomy resulted in no difference in long‐term QoL in patients with gastric cancer. Registration number: NCT01065688 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ). Abstract : No difference between reconstructions … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 103:Issue 4(2016)
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 103:Issue 4(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 103, Issue 4 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 103
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0103-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 337
- Page End:
- 347
- Publication Date:
- 2016-02-03
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/bjs.10060 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 1088.xml