Reproducibility of a battery of commonly used clinical tests to evaluate lumbopelvic motor control. Issue 4 (November 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Reproducibility of a battery of commonly used clinical tests to evaluate lumbopelvic motor control. Issue 4 (November 2015)
- Main Title:
- Reproducibility of a battery of commonly used clinical tests to evaluate lumbopelvic motor control
- Authors:
- Habets, Bas
van Cingel, Robert E.H.
Ostelo, Raymond W.J.G. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: To determine reproducibility of a battery of clinical tests for evaluating lumbopelvic motor control (LMC). Design: Test-retest design. Participants: Fifty healthy subjects. Outcome Measures: Two raters independently examined performance on 12 clinical tests for evaluating LMC. All tests were scored on a seven-point scale, based on qualitative and quantitative performance. Subjects were measured twice, with a two week interval between examinations. Intra- and inter-rater reproducibility of each test were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of measurement, smallest detectable change (SDC) and limits of agreement. Results: Reliability of the tests ranged from poor to excellent. Intra-rater ICCs ranged from 0.00 to 0.82, whereas inter-rater ICCs varied from 0.00 to 0.96. SDC values were smallest for supine leg raising, bent knee fall out, prone bridge and unilateral prone bridge (<2 points). Conclusion: This study shows limited reproducibility of a battery of 12 clinical tests for the evaluation of LMC in a healthy population. Supine leg raising, bent knee fall out, prone bridge, and unilateral prone bridge showed the smallest measurement errors. The other 8 tests were found to have large measurement errors. Based on these results, dichotomization of the rating method might be considered in order to improve reproducibility values. Highlights: There is no generally accepted test for evaluating lumbopelvic motor controlAbstract: Objective: To determine reproducibility of a battery of clinical tests for evaluating lumbopelvic motor control (LMC). Design: Test-retest design. Participants: Fifty healthy subjects. Outcome Measures: Two raters independently examined performance on 12 clinical tests for evaluating LMC. All tests were scored on a seven-point scale, based on qualitative and quantitative performance. Subjects were measured twice, with a two week interval between examinations. Intra- and inter-rater reproducibility of each test were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of measurement, smallest detectable change (SDC) and limits of agreement. Results: Reliability of the tests ranged from poor to excellent. Intra-rater ICCs ranged from 0.00 to 0.82, whereas inter-rater ICCs varied from 0.00 to 0.96. SDC values were smallest for supine leg raising, bent knee fall out, prone bridge and unilateral prone bridge (<2 points). Conclusion: This study shows limited reproducibility of a battery of 12 clinical tests for the evaluation of LMC in a healthy population. Supine leg raising, bent knee fall out, prone bridge, and unilateral prone bridge showed the smallest measurement errors. The other 8 tests were found to have large measurement errors. Based on these results, dichotomization of the rating method might be considered in order to improve reproducibility values. Highlights: There is no generally accepted test for evaluating lumbopelvic motor control (LMC). This study investigated reproducibility of 12 commonly used clinical tests for the evaluation of LMC. Supine leg raising, bent knee fall out, prone bridge and unilateral prone bridge showed the smallest measurement error. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Physical therapy in sport. Volume 16:Issue 4(2015)
- Journal:
- Physical therapy in sport
- Issue:
- Volume 16:Issue 4(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 16, Issue 4 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0016-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 331
- Page End:
- 339
- Publication Date:
- 2015-11
- Subjects:
- Motor control -- Lumbopelvic -- Reproducibility -- Reliability
Sports physical therapy -- Periodicals
Sports injuries -- Patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals
Athletic Injuries -- diagnosis -- Periodicals
Athletic Injuries -- therapy -- Periodicals
Physical Therapy -- Periodicals
Sports Medicine -- Periodicals
615.82088796 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/1466853X ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/1466853X ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/1466853X ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journal ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ptsp.2015.02.004 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1466-853X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6476.350650
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 339.xml