Does regional anaesthesia improve outcome after surgery?. Issue 11 (November 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fischer, Barrie; Bosch, Oscar Domingo
• Is Part Of: Anaesthesia and intensive care medicine. Volume 16:Issue 11(2015:Nov.)
• Page Start: 574
• Page End: 577
• Publication Date: 2015-11
• Subjects: Epidural -- regional anaesthesia -- regional analgesia -- spinal -- stress response -- surgical outcome; Anesthesiology -- Periodicals; Critical care medicine -- Periodicals; Anesthesia -- Periodicals; Intensive care -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 617.9605
• DOI: 10.1016/j.mpaic.2015.08.010
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1472-0299

Abstract

Abstract: There is conclusive evidence that regional anaesthesia provides better postoperative analgesia than systemic opioid techniques. Regional anaesthesia also has the potential to improve the functional outcome from surgery, although proving this in a clinically relevant way is challenging; many studies are inconclusive with methodological weaknesses making comparison difficult and offering conflicting evidence. Systematic reviews offer better evidence that regional anaesthesia improves outcome but both anaesthetic and surgical practice have evolved over time, so older data may not be relevant to current practice. Regional anaesthesia improves outcome only when incorporated into a structured postoperative rehabilitation and recovery programme (enhanced recovery), using the effective analgesia provided to achieve specific targets. These targets include early mobilization, active physiotherapy and early return to enteral nutrition. Other benefits of regional anaesthesia (reduced blood loss, lower risk of thromboembolic events and duration of ileus) also contribute to a reduction in postoperative morbidity. However, unless the postoperative recovery programme is modified to incorporate these benefits into a patient's recovery, the full impact of regional anaesthesia on surgical outcome will not be realized.