Impact of Neonatal Intensive Care Bed Configuration on Rates of Late-Onset Bacterial Sepsis and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization. (25th June 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Impact of Neonatal Intensive Care Bed Configuration on Rates of Late-Onset Bacterial Sepsis and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization. (25th June 2015)
- Main Title:
- Impact of Neonatal Intensive Care Bed Configuration on Rates of Late-Onset Bacterial Sepsis and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization
- Authors:
- Julian, Samuel
Burnham, Carey-Ann D.
Sellenriek, Patricia
Shannon, William D.
Hamvas, Aaron
Tarr, Phillip I.
Warner, Barbara B. - Abstract:
- Abstract : BACKGROUND: Infections cause morbidity and mortality in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The association between nursery design and nosocomial infections is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether rates of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), late-onset sepsis, and mortality are reduced in single-patient rooms. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: NICU in a tertiary referral center. METHODS: Our NICU is organized into single-patient and open-unit rooms. Clinical data sets including bed location and microbiology results were examined over 29 months. Differences in outcomes between bed configurations were determined by χ 2 and Cox regression. PATIENTS: All NICU patients. RESULTS: Among 1, 823 patients representing 55, 166 patient-days, single-patient and open-unit models had similar incidences of MRSA colonization and MRSA colonization-free survival times. Average daily census was associated with MRSA colonization rates only in single-patient rooms (hazard ratio, 1.31; P=. 039), whereas hand hygiene compliance on room entry and exit was associated with lower colonization rates independent of bed configuration (hazard ratios, 0.834 and 0.719 per 1% higher compliance, respectively). Late-onset sepsis rates were similar in single-patient and open-unit models as were sepsis-free survival and the combined outcome of sepsis or death. After controlling for demographic, clinical, and unit-based variables, multivariate CoxAbstract : BACKGROUND: Infections cause morbidity and mortality in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The association between nursery design and nosocomial infections is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether rates of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), late-onset sepsis, and mortality are reduced in single-patient rooms. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: NICU in a tertiary referral center. METHODS: Our NICU is organized into single-patient and open-unit rooms. Clinical data sets including bed location and microbiology results were examined over 29 months. Differences in outcomes between bed configurations were determined by χ 2 and Cox regression. PATIENTS: All NICU patients. RESULTS: Among 1, 823 patients representing 55, 166 patient-days, single-patient and open-unit models had similar incidences of MRSA colonization and MRSA colonization-free survival times. Average daily census was associated with MRSA colonization rates only in single-patient rooms (hazard ratio, 1.31; P=. 039), whereas hand hygiene compliance on room entry and exit was associated with lower colonization rates independent of bed configuration (hazard ratios, 0.834 and 0.719 per 1% higher compliance, respectively). Late-onset sepsis rates were similar in single-patient and open-unit models as were sepsis-free survival and the combined outcome of sepsis or death. After controlling for demographic, clinical, and unit-based variables, multivariate Cox regression demonstrated that bed configuration had no effect on MRSA colonization, late-onset sepsis, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: MRSA colonization rate was impacted by hand hygiene compliance, regardless of room configuration, whereas average daily census affected only infants in single-patient rooms. Single-patient rooms did not reduce the rates of MRSA colonization, late-onset sepsis, or death. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36(10):1173–1182 … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Infection control and hospital epidemiology. Volume 36:Number 10(2015)
- Journal:
- Infection control and hospital epidemiology
- Issue:
- Volume 36:Number 10(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 36, Issue 10 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 36
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0036-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- 1173
- Page End:
- 1182
- Publication Date:
- 2015-06-25
- Subjects:
- Nosocomial infections -- Epidemiology -- Periodicals
Health facilities -- Sanitation -- Periodicals
Hospital buildings -- Sanitation -- Periodicals
Cross Infection -- Periodicals
Epidemiology -- Periodicals
Hospitals -- Periodicals
Infection Control -- Periodicals
614.44 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&NEWS=n&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00004848-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=ICE ↗
http://www.ichejournal.com/default.asp ↗
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/ICHE/home.html ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/0899823X.html ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1017/ice.2015.144 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0899-823X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library STI - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 1997.xml