Affective expressions in groups and inferences about members' relational well-being: The effects of socially engaging and disengaging emotions. Issue 1 (2nd January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rothman, Naomi B.; Magee, Joe C.
• Is Part Of: Cognition and emotion. Volume 30:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 150
• Page End: 166
• Publication Date: 2016-01-02
• Subjects: Emotion -- Groups -- Conflict -- Cohesiveness -- Inferences; Cognition -- Periodicals; Emotions and cognition -- Periodicals; 155.413
• DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1020050
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0269-9931

Abstract

Abstract : Our findings draw attention to the interpersonal communication function of a relatively unexplored dimension of emotions—the level of social engagement versus disengagement. In four experiments, regardless of valence and target group gender, observers infer greater relational well-being (more cohesiveness and less conflict) between group members from socially engaging (sadness and appreciation) versus disengaging (anger and pride) emotion expressions. Supporting our argument that social (dis)engagement is a critical dimension communicated by these emotions, we demonstrate (1) that inferences about group members' self-interest mediate the effect of socially engaging emotions on cohesiveness and (2) that the influence of socially disengaging emotion expressions on inferences of conflict is attenuated when groups have collectivistic norms (i.e., members value a high level of social engagement). Furthermore, we show an important downstream consequence of these inferences of relational well-being: Groups that seem less cohesive because of their members' proud (versus appreciative) expressions are also expected to have worse task performance.