Trans‐subclavian versus transapical access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A multicenter study. Issue 2 (22nd May 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Trans‐subclavian versus transapical access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A multicenter study. Issue 2 (22nd May 2015)
- Main Title:
- Trans‐subclavian versus transapical access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A multicenter study
- Authors:
- Ciuca, Cristina
Tarantini, Giuseppe
Latib, Azeem
Gasparetto, Valeria
Savini, Carlo
Di Eusanio, Marco
Napodano, Massimo
Maisano, Francesco
Gerosa, Gino
Sticchi, Alessandro
Marzocchi, Antonio
Alfieri, Ottavio
Colombo, Antonio
Saia, Francesco - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: To compare the outcomes of trans‐subclavian (TS) and transapical (TA) access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Background: A considerable proportion of patients undergoing TAVI are not eligible for transfemoral approach. To date, there are few data to guide the choice between alternative vascular access routes. Methods: Among 874 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI, 202 procedures were performed through TA ( n = 142, 70.3%) or TS ( n = 60, 29.7%) access. Medtronic Corevalve (CV, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) was implanted in 17.3% of the patients, the Edwards‐Sapien (ES, Edwards Lifesciences Inc., Irvine, CA) in 81.2% and other prostheses in 0.1%. In‐hospital and long‐term outcome were assessed using the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)‐2 definitions. Results: Mean age was 82 ± 6 years, STS score 9.3 ± 7.9%. The 2 groups showed a relevant imbalance in baseline characteristics. In hospital mortality was 6.4% (1.7% TS vs. 8.4% TA, P = 0.06), stroke 2.0%, acute myocardial infarction 1.0%, acute kidney injury 39.4%, sepsis 4.0% with no significant differences between groups, while bleeding was more frequent in TA patients (53.5% vs. 11.7% TS, P < 0.001). One‐ and 2‐year survival was 85.2% and 73.2% in TS patients, and 83.9% and 74.9% in TA patients ( P = ns for both). Access site was not an independent predictor of mortality at multivariable analysis. Conclusion: Transapical compared with trans‐subclavian access for TAVI wasAbstract : Objectives: To compare the outcomes of trans‐subclavian (TS) and transapical (TA) access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Background: A considerable proportion of patients undergoing TAVI are not eligible for transfemoral approach. To date, there are few data to guide the choice between alternative vascular access routes. Methods: Among 874 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI, 202 procedures were performed through TA ( n = 142, 70.3%) or TS ( n = 60, 29.7%) access. Medtronic Corevalve (CV, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) was implanted in 17.3% of the patients, the Edwards‐Sapien (ES, Edwards Lifesciences Inc., Irvine, CA) in 81.2% and other prostheses in 0.1%. In‐hospital and long‐term outcome were assessed using the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)‐2 definitions. Results: Mean age was 82 ± 6 years, STS score 9.3 ± 7.9%. The 2 groups showed a relevant imbalance in baseline characteristics. In hospital mortality was 6.4% (1.7% TS vs. 8.4% TA, P = 0.06), stroke 2.0%, acute myocardial infarction 1.0%, acute kidney injury 39.4%, sepsis 4.0% with no significant differences between groups, while bleeding was more frequent in TA patients (53.5% vs. 11.7% TS, P < 0.001). One‐ and 2‐year survival was 85.2% and 73.2% in TS patients, and 83.9% and 74.9% in TA patients ( P = ns for both). Access site was not an independent predictor of mortality at multivariable analysis. Conclusion: Transapical compared with trans‐subclavian access for TAVI was associated with a nonsignificant trend to increased periprocedural events. However, 1‐ and 2‐year survival appears similar. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions. Volume 87:Issue 2(2016)
- Journal:
- Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
- Issue:
- Volume 87:Issue 2(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 87, Issue 2 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 87
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0087-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 332
- Page End:
- 338
- Publication Date:
- 2015-05-22
- Subjects:
- aortic stenosis -- transcatheter aortic valve replacement -- vascular access -- outcome
Heart -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals
Cardiac catheterization -- Periodicals
616.1207572 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1522-726X ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/ccd.26012 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1522-1946
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3092.992000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2748.xml