Specificity and detail in autobiographical memory: Same or different constructs?. Issue 2 (7th February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kyung, Yoonhee; Yanes-Lukin, Paula; Roberts, John E.
• Is Part Of: Memory. Volume 24:Issue 2(2016)
• Page Start: 272
• Page End: 284
• Publication Date: 2016-02-07
• Subjects: Autobiographical memory -- Memory specificity -- Memory detail -- Emotional distress -- Overgeneral memory; Memory -- Periodicals; 153.1205
• DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2014.1002411
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0965-8211

Abstract

Abstract : Research on autobiographical memory has focused on whether memories are coded as specific (i.e., describe a single event that happened at a particular time and place). Although some theory and research suggests that the amount of detail in autobiographical memories reflects a similar underlying construct as memory specificity, past research has not investigated whether these variables converge. Therefore, the present study compared the proportion of specific memories and the amount of detail embedded in memory responses to cue words. Results demonstrated that memory detail and proportion of specific memories were not correlated with each other and showed different patterns of association with other conceptually relevant variables. When responses to neutral cue words were examined in multiple linear and logistic regression analyses, the proportion of specific memories uniquely predicted less depressive symptoms, low emotional avoidance, lower emotion reactivity, better executive control and lower rumination, whereas the amount of memory detail uniquely predicted the presence of depression diagnosis, as well as greater depressive symptoms, subjective stress, emotion reactivity and rumination. Findings suggest that the ability to retrieve specific memories and the tendency to retrieve detailed personal memories reflect different constructs that have different implications in the development of emotional distress.