The rise of novelty in ecosystems. Issue 8 (1st December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Radeloff, Volker C.; Williams, John W.; Bateman, Brooke L.; Burke, Kevin D.; Carter, Sarah K.; Childress, Evan S.; Cromwell, Kara J.; Gratton, Claudio; Hasley, Andrew O.; Kraemer, Benjamin M.; Latzka, Alexander W.; Marin-Spiotta, Erika; Meine, Curt D.; Munoz, Samuel E.; Neeson, Thomas M.; Pidgeon, Anna M.; Rissman, Adena R.; Rivera, Ricardo J.; Szymanski, Laura M.; Usinowicz, Jacob
• Is Part Of: Ecological applications. Volume 25:Issue 8(2015)
• Page Start: 2051
• Page End: 2068
• Publication Date: 2015-12-01
• Subjects: Anthropocene -- biodiversity -- Centennial Paper -- conservation -- global change -- no-analog -- novel climates -- novel ecosystems -- novelty; Ecology -- Periodicals; Environmental protection -- Periodicals; Biology, Economic -- Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1890/14-1781.1
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1051-0761

Abstract

Abstract: Rapid and ongoing change creates novelty in ecosystems everywhere, both when comparing contemporary systems to their historical baselines, and predicted future systems to the present. However, the level of novelty varies greatly among places. Here we propose a formal and quantifiable definition of abiotic and biotic novelty in ecosystems, map abiotic novelty globally, and discuss the implications of novelty for the science of ecology and for biodiversity conservation. We define novelty as the degree of dissimilarity of a system, measured in one or more dimensions relative to a reference baseline, usually defined as either the present or a time window in the past. In this conceptualization, novelty varies in degree, it is multidimensional, can be measured, and requires a temporal and spatial reference. This definition moves beyond prior categorical definitions of novel ecosystems, and does not include human agency, self‐perpetuation, or irreversibility as criteria. Our global assessment of novelty was based on abiotic factors (temperature, precipitation, and nitrogen deposition) plus human population, and shows that there are already large areas with high novelty today relative to the early 20th century, and that there will even be more such areas by 2050. Interestingly, the places that are most novel are often not the places where absolute changes are largest; highlighting that novelty is inherently different from change. For the ecological sciences, highly novel ecosystems present new opportunities to test ecological theories, but also challenge the predictive ability of ecological models and their validation. For biodiversity conservation, increasing novelty presents some opportunities, but largely challenges. Conservation action is necessary along the entire continuum of novelty, by redoubling efforts to protect areas where novelty is low, identifying conservation opportunities where novelty is high, developing flexible yet strong regulations and policies, and establishing long‐term experiments to test management approaches. Meeting the challenge of novelty will require advances in the science of ecology, and new and creative conservation approaches.