'A Common Sense of the Times'? Neo‐liberalism and Changing Public Opinion in New Zealand and the UK. (10th May 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Humpage, Louise
• Is Part Of: Social policy & administration. Volume 50:Number 1(2016:Feb.)
• Page Start: 79
• Page End: 98
• Publication Date: 2015-05-10
• Subjects: Neo‐liberalism -- Public attitudes -- UK -- New Zealand -- Economic policy -- Social policy; Social policy -- Periodicals; Public administration -- Periodicals; 361.6105
• DOI: 10.1111/spol.12147
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0144-5596

Abstract

Abstract: Neo‐liberalism represents a significant and enduring shift in the politics shaping social policy. Although frequently ascribed a hegemonic, all‐powerful status that focuses our attention on the coherence found in neo‐liberal policies, this article builds on scholarly work highlighting variegation in the neo‐liberal project across different policy areas, national settings and time periods. Specifically, it employs Peck's and Tickell's (2002) view that neo‐liberalism has gone through multiple phases in response to both external and internal crises as an entry point for studying neo‐liberalism's impact on public support for the welfare state. Drawing upon New Zealand and British attitudinal data, the article argues that public reactions to an early period of retrenchment ('roll‐back' neo‐liberalism) differ from those reported in the 'roll‐out' or embedding phase of neo‐liberalism implemented by Third Way Labour Governments in both countries. Indeed, continuing public support in many policy areas arguably contributed to the internal crisis that provoked an adaptation to the neo‐liberal project. The article further explores public support for the welfare state following the external crisis provoked by the financial meltdown of 2008–09 asking whether New Zealand and British attitudes showed signs of resisting austerity measures or whether they, instead, indicated a third, 'roll‐over' period of neo‐liberalism where the public accepted not only a neo‐liberal economic agenda but also the need for further retrenchment of the welfare state. Conclusions about the politics of social policy at the level of public opinion offer both good and bad news for welfare state advocates.