Insulin‐induced gene 2 expression correlates with colorectal cancer metastasis and disease outcome. Issue 1 (10th December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sun, Shengjie; Zhang, Guoqing; Sun, Qiong; Wu, Zhiyong; Shi, Weiwei; Yang, Bo; Li, Ying
• Is Part Of: IUBMB life. Volume 68:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 65
• Page End: 71
• Publication Date: 2015-12-10
• Subjects: colorectal cancer -- insulin‐induced gene 2 -- EMT -- biomarker; Biochemistry -- Periodicals; Molecular biology -- Periodicals; 572.8
• DOI: 10.1002/iub.1461
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1521-6543

Abstract

Abstract: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide accounting for ∼9% of cancer‐related deaths, 90% of which are due to metastasis resulting from resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. Hence, it is imperative to develop novel biomarkers of CRC. Insulin‐induced gene 2 ( INSIG2 ) has been previously reported to be a negative regulator of cholesterol synthesis and was recently identified as a putative‐positive prognostic biomarker for colon and pancreatic cancer prognosis. Even though it has been suggested as a colon cancer biomarker and as an inhibitor of Bax‐mediated apoptosis, the role of INSIG2 in CRC is elusive. We initially validated that INSIG2 is a gene with univariate‐negative prognostic capacity to discriminate human colon cancer survivorship and that if present along with adenomatous polyposis coli ( APC ) gene mutations further decrease overall survival. Gain‐ and loss‐of‐function studies of INSIG2 showed that the gene product is responsible for inducing migration and invasion and maintenance of the mesenchymal phenotype in vitro and metastasis in vivo . Interestingly, loss of INSIG2 did not affect tumorigenic potential per se, but affected hepatic invasion in a xenograft assay. Our findings reinforce that INSIG2 is a novel colon cancer biomarker, and suggest, for the first time, an exclusive connection between INSIG2 and metastatic dissemination without any effect on tumorigenesis. © 2015 IUBMB Life, 68(1):65–71, 2016