GORD symptoms in lung transplantation: how efficient is the reflux symptom index questionnaire compared to the esophageal impedance test?. Issue 1 (16th December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Soresi, Simona; Zeriouh, Mohamed; Sabashnikov, Anton; Mc Dermott, Grainne; Weymann, Alexander; Wippermann, Jens; Wahlers, Thorsten; Reed, Anna; Carby, Martin; Simon, Andre R.; Popov, Aron‐Frederik
• Is Part Of: Clinical transplantation. Volume 30:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 44
• Page End: 51
• Publication Date: 2015-12-16
• Subjects: esophageal impedance test -- gastroesophageal reflux disease -- lung transplantation -- reflux symptom index score; Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc -- Periodicals; 617.95
• DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12656
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0902-0063

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: As Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) affects long‐term survival in lung transplant recipients, the aim of this observational prospective study was to analyze the efficacy of The Reflux Symptom Index Questionnaire (RSI) compared to the esophageal impedance test. Methods: Both esophageal impedance studies and RSI questionnaire were routinely performed in all patients who had completed rehabilitation following lung transplantation from June 2013 till March 2014. RSI generates a score of between zero and forty‐five, taking into account any symptoms within four wk of the questionnaire. Our analysis considered RSI score cut‐offs of 10 and 13 indicating significance of reflux. Results: Out of 84 patients, 50 (59.5%) had evidence of GORD detected by impedance studies, whereas only 33 (39.2%) and 22 (26.2%) had RSI >10 and 13, respectively. An elevated RSI was not found to be associated with positive impedance studies using a score of either 10 or 13 (p = 0.127 and p = 0.142, respectively); 32.1% (n = 27) and 40.5% (n = 34) were found to have negative RSI and positive impedance test using 10 or 13 as cut‐off, respectively. Conclusion: RSI Score is an unreliable predictor of GORD among lung transplant recipients. The authors therefore recommend the routine use of impedance testing in post‐transplant patients.