Decomposition of sources of errors in seasonal streamflow forecasting over the U.S. Sunbelt. Issue 23 (1st December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mazrooei, Amirhossein; Sinha, Tushar; Sankarasubramanian, A.; Kumar, Sujay; Peters‐Lidard, Christa D.
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 120:Issue 23(2015:Dec.)
• Page Start: 11, 809
• Page End: 11, 825
• Publication Date: 2015-12-01
• Subjects: streamflow forecasting -- error decomposition -- land surface models -- temporal disaggregation -- spatial downscaling; Atmospheric physics -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 551.5
• DOI: 10.1002/2015JD023687
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-897X

Abstract

Abstract: Seasonal streamflow forecasts, contingent on climate information, can be utilized to ensure water supply for multiple uses including municipal demands, hydroelectric power generation, and for planning agricultural operations. However, uncertainties in the streamflow forecasts pose significant challenges in their utilization in real‐time operations. In this study, we systematically decompose various sources of errors in developing seasonal streamflow forecasts from two Land Surface Models (LSMs) (Noah3.2 and CLM2), which are forced with downscaled and disaggregated climate forecasts. In particular, the study quantifies the relative contributions of the sources of errors from LSMs, climate forecasts, and downscaling/disaggregation techniques in developing seasonal streamflow forecast. For this purpose, three month ahead seasonal precipitation forecasts from the ECHAM4.5 general circulation model (GCM) were statistically downscaled from 2.8° to 1/8° spatial resolution using principal component regression (PCR) and then temporally disaggregated from monthly to daily time step using kernel‐nearest neighbor (K‐NN) approach. For other climatic forcings, excluding precipitation, we considered the North American Land Data Assimilation System version 2 (NLDAS‐2) hourly climatology over the years 1979 to 2010. Then the selected LSMs were forced with precipitation forecasts and NLDAS‐2 hourly climatology to develop retrospective seasonal streamflow forecasts over a period of 20 years (1991–2010). Finally, the performance of LSMs in forecasting streamflow under different schemes was analyzed to quantify the relative contribution of various sources of errors in developing seasonal streamflow forecast. Our results indicate that the most dominant source of errors during winter and fall seasons is the errors due to ECHAM4.5 precipitation forecasts, while temporal disaggregation scheme contributes to maximum errors during summer season. Key Points: Precipitation forecast dominates streamflow forecast errors in winter Temporal disaggregation scheme dominates streamflow forecast errors in dry seasons High forecasting skill over the Sunbelt west arises primarily from snow storage